Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas white-eye"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (hook wording) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Response) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:::* Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC) | :::* Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | ::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::*{{ping|Yoninah}} Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 18:25, 14 December 2019
DYK toolbox |
---|
Christmas white-eye
- ... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced its risk of extinction?
- ALT1:... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced the bird's risk of extinction?
- Reviewed: Germania Life Insurance Company Building
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC).
-
Shuipzv3, please expand your review to cover the DYK criteria you checked specifically and were met, which should be length, newness, neutrality, sourcing, freedom from copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook interest, length, and neutrality, and that the QPQ was adequate. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate.
Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? Yoninah (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate.