Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Christmas white-eye"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(hook wording)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Response)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:::* Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:::* Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 
::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 
::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 +
:::::*{{ping|Yoninah}} Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:25, 14 December 2019

Christmas white-eye

  • ... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced its risk of extinction?
    • ALT1:... that the establishment of a second population of Christmas white-eye has reduced the bird's risk of extinction?

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg I think it's good to go. Shuipzv3 (talk) 14:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Shuipzv3, please expand your review to cover the DYK criteria you checked specifically and were met, which should be length, newness, neutrality, sourcing, freedom from copyvio/close paraphrasing, hook interest, length, and neutrality, and that the QPQ was adequate. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Apologies. Article was 5x expanded, long enough, and is free from copyvio issues. Hook is of reasonable length, neutral in tone, and cited to a reliable source. QPQ was adequate. Symbol confirmed.svg Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but calling it a "second population" makes it sound proportionately equal to the first, which it is not. Could you write "a subpopulation" or "a subpopulation in a second location" or something like that? Yoninah (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Well I don't really think its misleading, but we could just be bold and go for a "small second population". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)