Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Christopher Gibbs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Edwardx (reply) |
imported>Montanabw (to prep 4) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from May 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 23:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Christopher Gibbs==== | ====Christopher Gibbs==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Christopher Gibbs|Christopher Gibbs}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Christopher Gibbs|Christopher Gibbs}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[Christopher Gibbs]]''', the "King of Chelsea", (together with [[Robert Fraser (art dealer)|Robert Fraser]]) is credited with inventing [[Swinging London]] and was the first man in England to wear [[flared trousers]] in 1961? | * ... that '''[[Christopher Gibbs]]''', the "King of Chelsea", (together with [[Robert Fraser (art dealer)|Robert Fraser]]) is credited with inventing [[Swinging London]] and was the first man in England to wear [[flared trousers]] in 1961? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Catt family]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Catt family]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]), [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) at 09:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]), [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) at 09:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The article at the moment does NOT qualify as a DYK. It is long enough of over 4500 characters. Hook is properly referenced. However I see the created start "new article" date as May 25 and it was submitted 6 days later of May 31. I don't see how this qualifies as being "new" = ''within the past five days.'' Maybe I have missed something. Can you explain this, as I see everything else as being correct and meets DYK requirements. I could approve otherwise if you can show me it meets the "new" requirement or the 5X requirement. Also the QPQ needs to be done.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] ([[User talk:Doug Coldwell|talk]]) 18:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The article at the moment does NOT qualify as a DYK. It is long enough of over 4500 characters. Hook is properly referenced. However I see the created start "new article" date as May 25 and it was submitted 6 days later of May 31. I don't see how this qualifies as being "new" = ''within the past five days.'' Maybe I have missed something. Can you explain this, as I see everything else as being correct and meets DYK requirements. I could approve otherwise if you can show me it meets the "new" requirement or the 5X requirement. Also the QPQ needs to be done.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] ([[User talk:Doug Coldwell|talk]]) 18:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
::* Thanks. I accept that it was six days, not five. My fault, sorry. However, I think this is the first time I've been late, and there is [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Supplementary_guidelines#Other_supplementary_rules_for_the_article|Rule D9]], " 'Five days old' limit should be strictly enforced only if there is a large backlog of hooks". As we have recently gone from three to two sets per day, we are short of approved hooks. Also, it's a fun hook and an interesting article. Plus, with you reviewing it within nine hours of the nom, it could reach the front page quicker than most new content anyway. So, with D9 in mind, perhaps you could cut me a little slack this once... I'll do the QPQ now. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 18:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | ::* Thanks. I accept that it was six days, not five. My fault, sorry. However, I think this is the first time I've been late, and there is [[Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Supplementary_guidelines#Other_supplementary_rules_for_the_article|Rule D9]], " 'Five days old' limit should be strictly enforced only if there is a large backlog of hooks". As we have recently gone from three to two sets per day, we are short of approved hooks. Also, it's a fun hook and an interesting article. Plus, with you reviewing it within nine hours of the nom, it could reach the front page quicker than most new content anyway. So, with D9 in mind, perhaps you could cut me a little slack this once... I'll do the QPQ now. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 18:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to Go now.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] ([[User talk:Doug Coldwell|talk]]) 19:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to Go now.--[[User:Doug Coldwell|Doug Coldwell]] ([[User talk:Doug Coldwell|talk]]) 19:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::* Thank you for your kind understanding - that was quick! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 19:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | + | ::* Thank you for your kind understanding - that was quick! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 19:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 23:14, 31 May 2014
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 23:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Christopher Gibbs
- ... that Christopher Gibbs, the "King of Chelsea", (together with Robert Fraser) is credited with inventing Swinging London and was the first man in England to wear flared trousers in 1961?
- Reviewed: Catt family
Created by Edwardx (talk), Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 09:24, 31 May 2014 (UTC).
- 16px The article at the moment does NOT qualify as a DYK. It is long enough of over 4500 characters. Hook is properly referenced. However I see the created start "new article" date as May 25 and it was submitted 6 days later of May 31. I don't see how this qualifies as being "new" = within the past five days. Maybe I have missed something. Can you explain this, as I see everything else as being correct and meets DYK requirements. I could approve otherwise if you can show me it meets the "new" requirement or the 5X requirement. Also the QPQ needs to be done.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I accept that it was six days, not five. My fault, sorry. However, I think this is the first time I've been late, and there is Rule D9, " 'Five days old' limit should be strictly enforced only if there is a large backlog of hooks". As we have recently gone from three to two sets per day, we are short of approved hooks. Also, it's a fun hook and an interesting article. Plus, with you reviewing it within nine hours of the nom, it could reach the front page quicker than most new content anyway. So, with D9 in mind, perhaps you could cut me a little slack this once... I'll do the QPQ now. Edwardx (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- File:Symbol confirmed.svg Good to Go now.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)