Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Circuit split"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Notecardforfree (Nomination for Circuit split) |
imported>George Ho (fix redir) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* ... that scholars suggest the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] is more likely to grant review of a case to resolve a '''[[circuit split]]''' than for any other reason? | * ... that scholars suggest the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] is more likely to grant review of a case to resolve a '''[[circuit split]]''' than for any other reason? | ||
| − | :* '''ALT1''':... that '''[[circuit | + | :* '''ALT1''':... that '''[[circuit split]]s''' may lead to [[economic inefficiency]]? |
:* | :* | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Notecardforfree|Notecardforfree]] ([[User talk:Notecardforfree|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC).</small> | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Notecardforfree|Notecardforfree]] ([[User talk:Notecardforfree|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC).</small> | ||
Revision as of 23:35, 27 June 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Circuit split
- ... that scholars suggest the Supreme Court of the United States is more likely to grant review of a case to resolve a circuit split than for any other reason?
- ALT1:... that circuit splits may lead to economic inefficiency?
5x expanded by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 19:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC).