Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Coast at Lakeshore East"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 04:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
imported>PumpkinSky (prep2) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
====Coast at Lakeshore East==== | ====Coast at Lakeshore East==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Coast at Lakeshore East|Coast at Lakeshore East}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Coast at Lakeshore East|Coast at Lakeshore East}} | ||
| − | + | *... that [[Magellan Development Group]] opted not to apply for public way permits for '''[[Coast at Lakeshore East]]''' because of the May [[2012 Chicago Summit]]? | |
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] ([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]). Self nom at 02:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] ([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]). Self nom at 02:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:41, 5 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 10:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Coast at Lakeshore East
- ... that Magellan Development Group opted not to apply for public way permits for Coast at Lakeshore East because of the May 2012 Chicago Summit?
Created/expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 02:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed: 2nd of 2 QPQs against Template:Did you know nominations/Fred Tenney, Fred Tenney (outfielder).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
QPQ done. Hook properly formatted. Article is new enough and long enough at the time of nomination. No images that need a copyright check. No plagiarism concerns. Hook is interesting enough based on article. Hook is supported by article text, which is supported by text.
Hook text will not be trivial when the building is complete and this NATO focus is not a POV pushing by its existence. --LauraHale (talk) 04:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)