Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cognitive specialization"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Staceydolxx (G2G!) |
imported>Staceydolxx (Fixing my poor editing!) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | New – As above; started expansion on 12th Nov and was nominated on the 18th Nov. | + | :[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] - Unable to read sources - AGF |
| − | Long enough – the article is long enough. | + | :*New – As above; started expansion on 12th Nov and was nominated on the 18th Nov. |
| − | Within policy – the article is neutral, has inline citations throughout the article and I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations. | + | :*Long enough – the article is long enough. |
| − | Hook - It is fewer than 200 characters, it is interesting and it is cited within the article (though I don't have access to the full sources) | + | :*Within policy – the article is neutral, has inline citations throughout the article and I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations. |
| − | QPQ - Done. | + | :*Hook - It is fewer than 200 characters, it is interesting and it is cited within the article (though I don't have access to the full sources) |
| − | Very interesting read and lots of citations - Good job! ツ[[user:Staceydolxx|Stacey]] ([[user talk:Staceydolxx|talk]]) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | + | :*QPQ - Done. |
| + | :Very interesting read and lots of citations - Good job! ツ[[user:Staceydolxx|Stacey]] ([[user talk:Staceydolxx|talk]]) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 20:39, 5 January 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cognitive specialization
- ... that there are specialized mechanisms in the human brain for trust, language, and putting ourselves "in another person's shoes"?
- Comment: Original nomination had two capitalized letters; fixed that so this is the actual article. Expanded from a stub; was posted on "Wiki project in Psychology: Articles that need attention" page.
- Reviewed: The Honest Company
5x expanded by Mbhargis (talk). Self nominated at 23:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
- Thank you, George! -- User:mbhargis
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Unable to read sources - AGF
- New – As above; started expansion on 12th Nov and was nominated on the 18th Nov.
- Long enough – the article is long enough.
- Within policy – the article is neutral, has inline citations throughout the article and I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations.
- Hook - It is fewer than 200 characters, it is interesting and it is cited within the article (though I don't have access to the full sources)
- QPQ - Done.
- Very interesting read and lots of citations - Good job! ツStacey (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)