Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cognitive specialization"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Staceydolxx
(G2G!)
imported>Staceydolxx
(Fixing my poor editing!)
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 22:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Symbol voting keep.svg [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] - Unable to read sources - AGF
+
 
New – As above; started expansion on 12th Nov and was nominated on the 18th Nov.
+
:[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] - Unable to read sources - AGF
Long enough – the article is long enough.
+
:*New – As above; started expansion on 12th Nov and was nominated on the 18th Nov.
Within policy – the article is neutral, has inline citations throughout the article and I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations.
+
:*Long enough – the article is long enough.
Hook - It is fewer than 200 characters, it is interesting and it is cited within the article (though I don't have access to the full sources)
+
:*Within policy – the article is neutral, has inline citations throughout the article and I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations.
QPQ - Done.
+
:*Hook - It is fewer than 200 characters, it is interesting and it is cited within the article (though I don't have access to the full sources)
Very interesting read and lots of citations - Good job! ツ[[user:Staceydolxx|Stacey]] ([[user talk:Staceydolxx|talk]]) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
+
:*QPQ - Done.
 +
:Very interesting read and lots of citations - Good job! ツ[[user:Staceydolxx|Stacey]] ([[user talk:Staceydolxx|talk]]) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:39, 5 January 2015

Cognitive specialization

  • Comment: Original nomination had two capitalized letters; fixed that so this is the actual article. Expanded from a stub; was posted on "Wiki project in Psychology: Articles that need attention" page.
  • Reviewed: The Honest Company

5x expanded by Mbhargis (talk). Self nominated at 23:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

  • The article started expanding on 12 November 2014. Six days later, 18 November, it was nominated. Don't worry; it was on time and within seven-day limit. So the nomination is safe. I just moved it to 13th (which I was mistaken)... and then 12th. --George Ho (talk) 07:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Any update on this? Mbhargis (talk) 01:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Symbol voting keep.svg - Unable to read sources - AGF
  • New – As above; started expansion on 12th Nov and was nominated on the 18th Nov.
  • Long enough – the article is long enough.
  • Within policy – the article is neutral, has inline citations throughout the article and I cannot find any evidence of copyright violations.
  • Hook - It is fewer than 200 characters, it is interesting and it is cited within the article (though I don't have access to the full sources)
  • QPQ - Done.
Very interesting read and lots of citations - Good job! ツStacey (talk) 20:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)