Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Combined hormonal contraception"
imported>Spicy (review DYK) |
imported>Spicy m (typo) |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Article was expanded 5x from July 22 to 26 (876 B -> 7090 B). No copyvio detected with Earwig. The hook and article are neutral, interesting and fully cited to [[WP:MEDRS]] compliant sources - spot check of sources shows that they support the text and are not closely paraphrased. Picture is free use and used in article, clear at low resolution. QPQ done. There's just one thing I'd like to nitpick: | Article was expanded 5x from July 22 to 26 (876 B -> 7090 B). No copyvio detected with Earwig. The hook and article are neutral, interesting and fully cited to [[WP:MEDRS]] compliant sources - spot check of sources shows that they support the text and are not closely paraphrased. Picture is free use and used in article, clear at low resolution. QPQ done. There's just one thing I'd like to nitpick: | ||
− | * ''Neurological advice is recommended in women on the anti-epileptic drug lamotrigine who are considering CHC'' - Unless I'm missing something, the source doesn't say anything about "neurological advice" specifically - it just says that "It is advised that alternative contraception should be considered".<ref>https://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/combined-hormonal-contraception/</ref> | + | * ''Neurological advice is recommended in women on the anti-epileptic drug lamotrigine who are considering CHC'' - Unless I'm missing something, the source doesn't say anything about "neurological advice" specifically - it just says that "It is advised that alternative contraception should be considered".<ref>https://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/combined-hormonal-contraception/</ref> Additionally, I think there should be more emphasis on the FSRH statement that "The risks of using CHC [in patients on lamotrigine] could outweigh the benefits."<ref>https://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/combined-hormonal-contraception/</ref> |
− | |||
Also, it's not necessary but I think it would be very helpful to provide statistics on the effectiveness of CHC use. There is some info on this in the FSRH report. Overall a good and informative article on an important topic - looking forward to the DYK. :) | Also, it's not necessary but I think it would be very helpful to provide statistics on the effectiveness of CHC use. There is some info on this in the FSRH report. Overall a good and informative article on an important topic - looking forward to the DYK. :) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 20:34, 13 August 2019
DYK toolbox |
---|
Combined hormonal contraception
- ... that the different types of combined hormonal contraception include a pill, a patch, an injection and a vaginal ring (pictured)? [1]
- Reviewed: Tiny the Wonder
5x expanded by Whispyhistory (talk). Self-nominated at 13:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC). I saw that this had been sitting here for a while, so I thought I'd review it... my first DYK review :)
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
Article was expanded 5x from July 22 to 26 (876 B -> 7090 B). No copyvio detected with Earwig. The hook and article are neutral, interesting and fully cited to WP:MEDRS compliant sources - spot check of sources shows that they support the text and are not closely paraphrased. Picture is free use and used in article, clear at low resolution. QPQ done. There's just one thing I'd like to nitpick:
- Neurological advice is recommended in women on the anti-epileptic drug lamotrigine who are considering CHC - Unless I'm missing something, the source doesn't say anything about "neurological advice" specifically - it just says that "It is advised that alternative contraception should be considered".[1] Additionally, I think there should be more emphasis on the FSRH statement that "The risks of using CHC [in patients on lamotrigine] could outweigh the benefits."[2]
Also, it's not necessary but I think it would be very helpful to provide statistics on the effectiveness of CHC use. There is some info on this in the FSRH report. Overall a good and informative article on an important topic - looking forward to the DYK. :)