Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Commission Directive 91/71/EEC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DYKReviewBot m (Automatically reviewing nomination: No issues found (Problems? Report it.)) |
imported>Miyagawa (Reviewed) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Commission Directive 91/71/EEC==== | ====Commission Directive 91/71/EEC==== | ||
| − | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=EEC|Commission Directive 91/71/EEC}} | + | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Commission Directive 91/71/EEC|Commission Directive 91/71/EEC}} |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. Please [[User talk:Intelligentsium|report any issues]] with the bot.<includeonly>{{hidden end}}</includeonly> --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 19:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC) | Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. Please [[User talk:Intelligentsium|report any issues]] with the bot.<includeonly>{{hidden end}}</includeonly> --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 19:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
<!-- End automated review --> | <!-- End automated review --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I think that's a hook which will get plenty of clicks from both sides of the Brexit argument. It certainly would have got mine! Article is newly created, meets size requirement and is fully cited, including cites to the hook fact. Copy violation checks come up clear. I took the liberty of fixing part of the nomination template, so hopefully that should all work fine now. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 16:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 16:10, 4 September 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Commission Directive 91/71/EEC
- ... that contrary to popular belief, the EU did not attempt to ban prawn cocktail crisps?
- Reviewed: Janeway Lambda one
Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 08:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC).
- REDIRECT Template:•
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 07:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2053 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 23.7% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- REDIRECT Template:•No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 81 characters
- ✓ The C of E has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Janeway Lambda one was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
I think that's a hook which will get plenty of clicks from both sides of the Brexit argument. It certainly would have got mine! Article is newly created, meets size requirement and is fully cited, including cites to the hook fact. Copy violation checks come up clear. I took the liberty of fixing part of the nomination template, so hopefully that should all work fine now. Miyagawa (talk) 16:10, 4 September 2016 (UTC)