Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Community Based Program Design"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Launchballer
(+comment)
imported>Launchballer
(whoops)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* It never ceases to amaze me the great hypocrisy of AfC - good articles get rejected, yet this has somehow made it. While it is long enough, new enough, QPQ unnecessary, no copyvios found, there is too much [[WP:NPOV]]-violating content. Furthermore, the referencing is poor and insufficient for an AfC pass, never mind a mainpage appearance. I can't even see what this is notable for. Now being considered for deletion at AfD.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<font color="#00F">Laun</font>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<font color="#00F">chba</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<font color="#00F">ller</font>]]</span> 09:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] It never ceases to amaze me the great hypocrisy of AfC - good articles get rejected, yet this has somehow made it. While it is long enough, new enough, QPQ unnecessary, no copyvios found, there is too much [[WP:NPOV]]-violating content. Furthermore, the referencing is poor and insufficient for an AfC pass, never mind a mainpage appearance. I can't even see what this is notable for. Now being considered for deletion at AfD.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">[[User:Launchballer|<font color="#00F">Laun</font>]][[User talk:Launchballer|<font color="#00F">chba</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Launchballer|<font color="#00F">ller</font>]]</span> 09:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 09:33, 9 May 2014

Community Based Program Design

  • Comment: This passed AfC on April 9, 2014.

Moved to mainspace by Philroc (talk). Self nominated at 00:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg It never ceases to amaze me the great hypocrisy of AfC - good articles get rejected, yet this has somehow made it. While it is long enough, new enough, QPQ unnecessary, no copyvios found, there is too much WP:NPOV-violating content. Furthermore, the referencing is poor and insufficient for an AfC pass, never mind a mainpage appearance. I can't even see what this is notable for. Now being considered for deletion at AfD.--Launchballer 09:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)