Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>PumpkinSky
(prep4)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
====Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry====
 
====Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry|Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry|Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry}}
{{*mp}}... that although the '''[[Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry]]''' spans 73 games and dates back to 1922, the teams did not meet in the post season until the [[2009 NCAA Division I Men's Lacrosse Championship]]?
+
*... that although the '''[[Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry]]''' spans 73 games and dates back to 1922, the teams did not meet in the post season until the [[2009 NCAA Division I Men's Lacrosse Championship]]?
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] ([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]).  Self nom at 01:32, 25 November 2011 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] ([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|talk]]).  Self nom at 01:32, 25 November 2011 (UTC)</small>
  

Latest revision as of 20:50, 5 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:17, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Cornell–Princeton lacrosse rivalry

Created/expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 01:32, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg Date, article length, and hook length check out. The fact in the hook about 73 games is not explicitly stated or sourced in the prose of the article. The facts at the end of the lead paragraph in the article are also unsourced. KimChee (talk) 07:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg The numbers add up and the article looks to be sufficiently sourced now. KimChee (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2011 (UTC)