Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Craigslist v. 3Taps"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (please do not break discussion history) |
imported>Yoninah (ce) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that according to Craigslist v. 3Taps, it may be illegal to screen scrape a website over the owner's objections? | + | * ... that according to '''''[[Craigslist v. 3Taps]]''''', it may be illegal to [[screen scraping|screen scrape]] a website over the owner's objections? |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
Revision as of 09:49, 18 March 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Craigslist v. 3Taps
- ... that according to Craigslist v. 3Taps, it may be illegal to screen scrape a website over the owner's objections?
Created by Wh-237 (talk). Nominated by Colinpmacarthur (talk) at 06:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC).
The article is new enough (moved from sandbox), long enough, neutral, and well-referenced. The hook is short and I think it's interesting, but I don't think the hook's content is stated directly within the article, nor do I think it is sufficiently cited within the article. Would you be able to provide an alternative hook? -- クラウド668 04:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)- Thanks. I've revised the hook:
- ALT1: ... that in Craigslist v. 3Taps, Craigslist sued Padmapper for screen scraping Craiglist listings? Colinpmacarthur (talk) 05:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)