Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Craigslist v. 3Taps"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(please do not break discussion history)
imported>Yoninah
(ce)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that according to Craigslist v. 3Taps, it may be illegal to screen scrape a website over the owner's objections?
+
* ... that according to '''''[[Craigslist v. 3Taps]]''''', it may be illegal to [[screen scraping|screen scrape]] a website over the owner's objections?
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
-->
 
-->

Revision as of 09:49, 18 March 2014


Craigslist v. 3Taps

Created by Wh-237 (talk). Nominated by Colinpmacarthur (talk) at 06:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg The article is new enough (moved from sandbox), long enough, neutral, and well-referenced. The hook is short and I think it's interesting, but I don't think the hook's content is stated directly within the article, nor do I think it is sufficiently cited within the article. Would you be able to provide an alternative hook? -- クラウド668 04:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I've revised the hook:
  • ALT1: ... that in Craigslist v. 3Taps, Craigslist sued Padmapper for screen scraping Craiglist listings? Colinpmacarthur (talk) 05:19, 18 March 2014 (UTC)