Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cranfield experiments"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mandarax m (Fix typo) |
imported>Andrew Davidson (review) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | + | <u>Review</u> | |
| + | {{DYK checklist | ||
| + | |newness = y | ||
| + | |length = y | ||
| + | |eligibilityother = | ||
| + | |sourced = y | ||
| + | |neutral = y | ||
| + | |plagiarismfree = y | ||
| + | |policyother = | ||
| + | |hookcited = y | ||
| + | |hookinterest = y | ||
| + | |hookother = | ||
| + | |picfree = NA | ||
| + | |picused = | ||
| + | |picclear = | ||
| + | |qpq = y | ||
| + | |status = y | ||
| + | |comments = The first hook about civility is best and might be even better if the parallels with Wikipedia were clearer, such as our disputes about categories. The article could use some examples to make the different indexing schemes clearer but that's not a significant obstacle to DYK. | ||
| + | |sign = [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]]🐉([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 00:08, 6 February 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | }} | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 00:08, 6 February 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cranfield experiments
- ... that debate over the Cranfield experiments in information retrieval went "well beyond the boundaries of civility"? Source: quote directly attributed in Critisms section, from Robertson page 4
- ALT1:... that the Cranfield experiments in information retrieval suggested queries should be made in natural language? Source: Robertson page 3
- Reviewed: Reema Juffali
5x expanded by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 15:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC).
Review Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.