Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cream-spotted cardinalfish"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gaff (reply) |
imported>AshLin (Comments & Good to go) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:* Began review, new enough, long enough. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 11:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | :* Began review, new enough, long enough. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 11:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | :* Info clumped up, seperated it into sections, makes it more readable. Done. | + | :* Info clumped up, seperated it into sections, makes it more readable. {{Done}}. |
:* {{ping|Gaff}} Hook just not interesting enough - there are many monotypic genera. Please suggest alternatives not invoving monotypic genus status. | :* {{ping|Gaff}} Hook just not interesting enough - there are many monotypic genera. Please suggest alternatives not invoving monotypic genus status. | ||
− | :* Please use [[Template:Convert]] for depth range to show depth both in feet and meters. | + | :* Please use [[Template:Convert]] for depth range to show depth both in feet and meters.{{done}} |
− | :* The superfluous words "Ref Ref. 90102" & "TL male/unsexed" shows sloppy cut & paste from Fishbase. Please be careful, it also implies that copyvio/close paraphrasing issues may exist. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 14:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | + | :* The superfluous words "Ref Ref. 90102" & "TL male/unsexed" shows sloppy cut & paste from Fishbase. Please be careful, it also implies that copyvio/close paraphrasing issues may exist. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 14:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC){{done}} |
− | :** Yes, besides the two copyvios, there are close paraphrasing issues also - " a single pore above and below the raised median canal on each pored lateral line scale", please rephrase this. | + | :** Yes, besides the two copyvios, there are close paraphrasing issues also - " a single pore above and below the raised median canal on each pored lateral line scale", please rephrase this.{{done}} |
:** "color patterns present on the head body and vertical fins and" | :** "color patterns present on the head body and vertical fins and" | ||
:** "apogonichthys foa fowleria and neamia" | :** "apogonichthys foa fowleria and neamia" | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:* '''ALT5''' ... that this summer a nocturnal [[mouthbrooder]], the '''[[Ozichthys|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''', was found to be the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish? <em>—<font color="Indigo">[[User:Gaff|Gaff]]</font> <sup><small><b><font color="MediumSlateBlue">[[User_talk:Gaff|ταλκ]]</font></b></small></sup></em> 21:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | :* '''ALT5''' ... that this summer a nocturnal [[mouthbrooder]], the '''[[Ozichthys|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''', was found to be the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish? <em>—<font color="Indigo">[[User:Gaff|Gaff]]</font> <sup><small><b><font color="MediumSlateBlue">[[User_talk:Gaff|ταλκ]]</font></b></small></sup></em> 21:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
+ | I recommend a mish-mash of of the above, composed from two seperate sentences in the text & duly referenced inline. | ||
+ | :* '''ALT6''' ... that the '''[[Ozichthys|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''', the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish, ''[[Ozichthys]]'', described in 2014, is a [[nocturnal]] [[mouthbrooder]]? {{done}} | ||
+ | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go | ||
+ | [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 07:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 07:22, 19 October 2014
DYK toolbox |
---|
Ozichthys albimaculosus
- ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish is the type species of a new genus of tropical ray-finned fish described in 2014?
- ALT1 ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish is the type species of a new genus of fish described in 2014?
- ALT2 ... that Ozichthys albimaculosus is the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish described in 2014?
- Reviewed: Djibouti at the 2008 Summer Olympics
Created/expanded by Gaff (talk). Self nominated at 21:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC).
- Began review, new enough, long enough. AshLin (talk) 11:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Info clumped up, seperated it into sections, makes it more readable.
Done.
- Template:Ping Hook just not interesting enough - there are many monotypic genera. Please suggest alternatives not invoving monotypic genus status.
- Please use Template:Convert for depth range to show depth both in feet and meters.
Done
- The superfluous words "Ref Ref. 90102" & "TL male/unsexed" shows sloppy cut & paste from Fishbase. Please be careful, it also implies that copyvio/close paraphrasing issues may exist. AshLin (talk) 14:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Done
- Yes, besides the two copyvios, there are close paraphrasing issues also - " a single pore above and below the raised median canal on each pored lateral line scale", please rephrase this.
Done
- "color patterns present on the head body and vertical fins and"
- "apogonichthys foa fowleria and neamia"
- Yes, besides the two copyvios, there are close paraphrasing issues also - " a single pore above and below the raised median canal on each pored lateral line scale", please rephrase this.
- Please reconcile these & ping me or place a message on my talk page. AshLin (talk) 14:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thank you for the review. Copyvio/close paraphrasing concerns have (hopefully) been adequately addressed. Sadly, your concerns about the hook not being of interest may prove insurmountable, in which case, I'll abandon this as a candidate. To a lay reader such as myself (physician by trade), a new genus of fish being described this year (2 months ago) seems interesting enough. (At least as, if not more, interesting than 2 out of 5 DYK noms.)[citation needed] But, I'm happy to work with you... How about these? One emphasizes the timeliness of the entry, another notes some interesting features of the fish, and one does both:
- ALT3 ... that this summer the cream-spotted cardinalfish was announced to be the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish?
- ALT4 ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish is a nocturnal mouthbrooder, was announced this summer to be the sole member of a new genus?
- ALT5 ... that this summer a nocturnal mouthbrooder, the cream-spotted cardinalfish, was found to be the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish? —Gaff ταλκ 21:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
I recommend a mish-mash of of the above, composed from two seperate sentences in the text & duly referenced inline.
- ALT6 ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish, the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish, Ozichthys, described in 2014, is a nocturnal mouthbrooder?
Done
- ALT6 ... that the cream-spotted cardinalfish, the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish, Ozichthys, described in 2014, is a nocturnal mouthbrooder?