Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cream-spotted cardinalfish"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>AshLin
(Comments & Good to go)
imported>Hawkeye7
(Passed - moved to prep area 1)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from September 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=September 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Ozichthys albimaculosus====
 
====Ozichthys albimaculosus====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cream-spotted cardinalfish|Ozichthys albimaculosus}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Cream-spotted cardinalfish|Ozichthys albimaculosus}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the '''[[Ozichthys albimaculosus|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''' is the [[type species]] of a new genus of tropical [[ray-finned fish]] described in 2014?
 
* ... that the '''[[Ozichthys albimaculosus|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''' is the [[type species]] of a new genus of tropical [[ray-finned fish]] described in 2014?
 
* '''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Ozichthys albimaculosus|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''' is the [[type species]] of a new genus of fish described in 2014?
 
* '''ALT1''' ... that the '''[[Ozichthys albimaculosus|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''' is the [[type species]] of a new genus of fish described in 2014?
 
* '''ALT2''' ... that '''[[Ozichthys albimaculosus]]''' is the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish described in 2014?
 
* '''ALT2''' ... that '''[[Ozichthys albimaculosus]]''' is the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish described in 2014?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Djibouti at the 2008 Summer Olympics|Djibouti at the 2008 Summer Olympics]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Djibouti at the 2008 Summer Olympics|Djibouti at the 2008 Summer Olympics]]
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Gaff|Gaff]] ([[User talk:Gaff|talk]]). Self nominated at 21:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Gaff|Gaff]] ([[User talk:Gaff|talk]]). Self nominated at 21:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Ozichthys albimaculosus|Gaff|subpage=Cream-spotted cardinalfish}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* Began review, new enough, long enough. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 11:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 
:* Began review, new enough, long enough. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 11:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Line 31: Line 21:
 
:** "apogonichthys foa fowleria and neamia"
 
:** "apogonichthys foa fowleria and neamia"
 
:* Please reconcile these & ping me or place a message on my talk page. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 14:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
 
:* Please reconcile these & ping me or place a message on my talk page. [[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 14:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
<!-- By replacing this line, write first comment here. -->
 
 
::* {{Ping|AshLin}}  Thank you for the review.  Copyvio/close paraphrasing concerns have (hopefully) been adequately addressed.  Sadly, your concerns about the hook not being of interest may prove insurmountable, in which case, I'll abandon this as a candidate.  To a lay reader such as myself (physician by trade), a new genus of fish being described this year (2 months ago) seems interesting enough. (At least as, if not more, interesting than 2 out of 5 DYK noms.){{cn}}  But, I'm happy to work with you... How about these?  One emphasizes the timeliness of the entry, another notes some interesting features of the fish, and one does both:  
 
::* {{Ping|AshLin}}  Thank you for the review.  Copyvio/close paraphrasing concerns have (hopefully) been adequately addressed.  Sadly, your concerns about the hook not being of interest may prove insurmountable, in which case, I'll abandon this as a candidate.  To a lay reader such as myself (physician by trade), a new genus of fish being described this year (2 months ago) seems interesting enough. (At least as, if not more, interesting than 2 out of 5 DYK noms.){{cn}}  But, I'm happy to work with you... How about these?  One emphasizes the timeliness of the entry, another notes some interesting features of the fish, and one does both:  
 
:* '''ALT3''' ... that this summer the '''[[Ozichthys|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''' was announced to be the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish?
 
:* '''ALT3''' ... that this summer the '''[[Ozichthys|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''' was announced to be the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish?
Line 40: Line 29:
 
:* '''ALT6'''  ... that the '''[[Ozichthys|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''', the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish, ''[[Ozichthys]]'', described in 2014, is a [[nocturnal]] [[mouthbrooder]]? {{done}}
 
:* '''ALT6'''  ... that the '''[[Ozichthys|cream-spotted cardinalfish]]''', the sole member of a new genus of tropical fish, ''[[Ozichthys]]'', described in 2014, is a [[nocturnal]] [[mouthbrooder]]? {{done}}
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go
 
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go
[[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 07:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
+
[[User:AshLin|AshLin]] ([[User talk:AshLin|talk]]) 07:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 11:00, 20 October 2014

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Ozichthys albimaculosus

Created/expanded by Gaff (talk). Self nominated at 21:14, 28 September 2014 (UTC).

  • Began review, new enough, long enough. AshLin (talk) 11:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Info clumped up, seperated it into sections, makes it more readable.  Done.
  • Template:Ping Hook just not interesting enough - there are many monotypic genera. Please suggest alternatives not invoving monotypic genus status.
  • Please use Template:Convert for depth range to show depth both in feet and meters. Done
  • The superfluous words "Ref Ref. 90102" & "TL male/unsexed" shows sloppy cut & paste from Fishbase. Please be careful, it also implies that copyvio/close paraphrasing issues may exist. AshLin (talk) 14:19, 18 October 2014 (UTC) Done
    • Yes, besides the two copyvios, there are close paraphrasing issues also - " a single pore above and below the raised median canal on each pored lateral line scale", please rephrase this. Done
    • "color patterns present on the head body and vertical fins and"
    • "apogonichthys foa fowleria and neamia"
  • Please reconcile these & ping me or place a message on my talk page. AshLin (talk) 14:27, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Thank you for the review. Copyvio/close paraphrasing concerns have (hopefully) been adequately addressed. Sadly, your concerns about the hook not being of interest may prove insurmountable, in which case, I'll abandon this as a candidate. To a lay reader such as myself (physician by trade), a new genus of fish being described this year (2 months ago) seems interesting enough. (At least as, if not more, interesting than 2 out of 5 DYK noms.)[citation needed] But, I'm happy to work with you... How about these? One emphasizes the timeliness of the entry, another notes some interesting features of the fish, and one does both:

I recommend a mish-mash of of the above, composed from two seperate sentences in the text & duly referenced inline.

Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go

AshLin (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2014 (UTC)