Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Cultural competence in health care"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Edwardx (unlinking United States and physicians) |
imported>Andrew Davidson (review) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*A1: The article is new. {{tick}} |
| + | :*A2: It is long enough. {{tick}} | ||
| + | :*A3: It fails to follow all our policies and guidelines. In particular, it lacks an neutral tone, seeming too tendentious and promotional. For example, "''organizations should include these considerations in all aspects of policy making''"; "''As more and more immigrants are coming to America...''"; "''an organization must acknowledge the importance of cultures''". "''This is a very good resource for health care systems...''". Also, the section ''Cultural competence in various Disciplines'' consists of nothing but headings and a bare outline like that is frowned on at DYK. Moreover, it seems too ironic that an article about cross-cultural understanding should limit its scope to the USA. {{cross}} | ||
| + | :*H1: The hook length is fine.{{tick}} | ||
| + | :*H2: The hook content seems ok and has adequate citation support.{{tick}} | ||
| + | :*O1: The QPQ was done.{{tick}} | ||
| + | :*O2: There's no image.{{tick}} | ||
| + | [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] In conclusion, the page seems to need a substantial copy edit to improve its tone before it will pass. [[user:Andrew Davidson|Andrew]] ([[user talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 18:24, 29 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 18:24, 29 September 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Cultural competence in health care
- ... that in the United States, some physicians are required to obtain cultural competency training?
- Reviewed: Gerald Westbury
- Comment: I know this submission is a day late but I recently moved and had no internet (that's my excuse). Also, this page was created as a GLAM/Rutgers project, so the article creator was Wkinforocks and I am assisting as the Wikipedian-in-Residence.
Created by Wkinforocks (talk) and Staticshakedown (talk). Nominated by Staticshakedown (talk) at 14:33, 14 August 2014 (UTC).
- A1: The article is new.

- A2: It is long enough.

- A3: It fails to follow all our policies and guidelines. In particular, it lacks an neutral tone, seeming too tendentious and promotional. For example, "organizations should include these considerations in all aspects of policy making"; "As more and more immigrants are coming to America..."; "an organization must acknowledge the importance of cultures". "This is a very good resource for health care systems...". Also, the section Cultural competence in various Disciplines consists of nothing but headings and a bare outline like that is frowned on at DYK. Moreover, it seems too ironic that an article about cross-cultural understanding should limit its scope to the USA.
- A1: The article is new.
- REDIRECT Template:Xmark
|
- H1: The hook length is fine.

- H2: The hook content seems ok and has adequate citation support.

- O1: The QPQ was done.

- O2: There's no image.

- H1: The hook length is fine.
In conclusion, the page seems to need a substantial copy edit to improve its tone before it will pass. Andrew (talk) 18:24, 29 September 2014 (UTC)