Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dario Fo"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
imported>IznoBot
m (→‎top: Lint DYKN archive pattern (Task 2))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{#if:no|<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
 
{{#if:no|<noinclude>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
:{{DYKF|00}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Dario Fo]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dario Fo|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Dario Fo|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</i></span>{{clear}}
+
:{{DYKF|00}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Dario Fo]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dario Fo|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Dario Fo|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</span></i>{{clear}}
  
 
The result was: <b>rejected</b> by [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 18:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC).<br />
 
The result was: <b>rejected</b> by [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 18:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC).<br />

Latest revision as of 04:06, 19 October 2018

17x17px The following is an archived discussion of Dario Fo's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know12x12px (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: rejected by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC).

Dario Fo

  • ... that the Vatican has accused Dario Fo (pictured) of being responsible for "the most blasphemous show in the history of television"?
  • Comment: This Nobel Prize-winning bio has been expanded and sourced a great deal in recent days so I wonder if it has a place here? Before / Now

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by 86.40.103.168 (talk). Self nominated at 02:53, 25 March 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px Unfortunately, the expansion isn't actually enough for DYK. By my count, before the expansion there were 10981 characters, to 34676 characters now, for a 3.15x expansion. The 2x criterion applies only to Biographies of Living Persons which were previously unreferenced, and this article did have seven refs. For DYK, this would need to go to a 5x expansion, which is unlikely. For articles in this situation, WP:Good Articles is usually a better venue to promote the article. (By the way, a 3x expansion for an article of this length is very impressive) Chris857 (talk) 02:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px Per Chris857, this simply isn't a 5x expansion, and there have been no further attempts to expand the article since the above was posted. Absent a major additional expansion, alas, there's nothing to do but close the nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)