Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Darnell Hunt"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Narutolovehinata5 (reply) |
imported>97198 (to prep 2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from November 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:97198|97198]] ([[User talk:97198|talk]]) 04:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Darnell Hunt==== | ====Darnell Hunt==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Darnell Hunt|Darnell Hunt}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Darnell Hunt|Darnell Hunt}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[Darnell Hunt]]''', the Dean of Social Sciences at UCLA, believes Hollywood should use the [[Rooney Rule]] to increase the share of African American writers? <small>{{cite news|last1=Robb|first1=David|title=New Report Calls On TV Industry To Adopt NFL’s “Rooney Rule” To Address Exclusion Of Black Writers & Showrunners|url=http://deadline.com/2017/11/black-writers-hollywood-study-rooney-rule-color-of-change-report-1202199478/|accessdate=November 21, 2017|work=Deadline|date=November 1, 2017}}</small> | * ... that '''[[Darnell Hunt]]''', the Dean of Social Sciences at UCLA, believes Hollywood should use the [[Rooney Rule]] to increase the share of African American writers? <small>{{cite news|last1=Robb|first1=David|title=New Report Calls On TV Industry To Adopt NFL’s “Rooney Rule” To Address Exclusion Of Black Writers & Showrunners|url=http://deadline.com/2017/11/black-writers-hollywood-study-rooney-rule-color-of-change-report-1202199478/|accessdate=November 21, 2017|work=Deadline|date=November 1, 2017}}</small> | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]). Self-nominated at 01:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]). Self-nominated at 01:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* {{re|Zigzig20s}} Per [https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/cgi-bin/dyk.py?user=Zigzig20s QPQ check results], it appears that a QPQ review is needed. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 14:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC) | :* {{re|Zigzig20s}} Per [https://tools.wmflabs.org/betacommand-dev/cgi-bin/dyk.py?user=Zigzig20s QPQ check results], it appears that a QPQ review is needed. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 14:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
| Line 24: | Line 16: | ||
:::::{{ping|Zigzig20s}} Well [[WP:V]] and [[WP:BLP]] do say that footnotes are required if statements are contentious, and that statement [[WP:BLUE|isn't really contentious]], so I can give you that. No copyright violations or plagiarism detected either so there are no other problems with the article. All that's needed now is a QPQ. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 03:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC) | :::::{{ping|Zigzig20s}} Well [[WP:V]] and [[WP:BLP]] do say that footnotes are required if statements are contentious, and that statement [[WP:BLUE|isn't really contentious]], so I can give you that. No copyright violations or plagiarism detected either so there are no other problems with the article. All that's needed now is a QPQ. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 03:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
:I've just reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Amusement]].[[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 10:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC) | :I've just reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Amusement]].[[User:Zigzig20s|Zigzig20s]] ([[User talk:Zigzig20s|talk]]) 10:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::QPQ has been provided; as such, this is ready for DYK. [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 10:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC) | + | ::QPQ has been provided; as such, this is ready for DYK. [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 10:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 04:08, 24 December 2017
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 04:08, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Darnell Hunt
- ... that Darnell Hunt, the Dean of Social Sciences at UCLA, believes Hollywood should use the Rooney Rule to increase the share of African American writers? Robb, David (November 1, 2017). "New Report Calls On TV Industry To Adopt NFL's "Rooney Rule" To Address Exclusion Of Black Writers & Showrunners". Deadline. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
Created by Zigzig20s (talk). Self-nominated at 01:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC).
- Template:Re Per QPQ check results, it appears that a QPQ review is needed. North America1000 14:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- 16px Article meets newness and length requirements. No image so no problem there. Proposed hook is interesting and is cited. The article however has some typos and/or needs some revisions: "commissioned by the Color of Change" probably doesn't need the quotation marks, for example. Also, "showed that very few television were black" needs to be clarified. The sentence regarding his O.J. Simpson book has no footnote. "Graaf a History professor" should be "Graaf, a History professor". As mentioned by Northamerica1000, a QPQ is still needed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:22, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- I've fixed the typos. The O.J. Simpson book is self-evident given the title.Zigzig20s (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Yes, but it would still be good to have a footnote there, if only to verify that he wrote the book. Once that's resolved this will be good to go. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- There's an ISBN and OCLC...Zigzig20s (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Well WP:V and WP:BLP do say that footnotes are required if statements are contentious, and that statement isn't really contentious, so I can give you that. No copyright violations or plagiarism detected either so there are no other problems with the article. All that's needed now is a QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- There's an ISBN and OCLC...Zigzig20s (talk) 03:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Yes, but it would still be good to have a footnote there, if only to verify that he wrote the book. Once that's resolved this will be good to go. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:08, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- I've fixed the typos. The O.J. Simpson book is self-evident given the title.Zigzig20s (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- I've just reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Amusement.Zigzig20s (talk) 10:32, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
