Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/David Gwilym Morris Roberts"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 10:58, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
imported>Redtigerxyz (prep 4) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
====David Gwilym Morris Roberts==== | ====David Gwilym Morris Roberts==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=David Gwilym Morris Roberts|David Gwilym Morris Roberts}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=David Gwilym Morris Roberts|David Gwilym Morris Roberts}} | ||
− | + | *... that '''[[David Gwilym Morris Roberts]]''' helped design [[Baghdad]]'s first [[sewage treatment]] system? | |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Scott Endersby]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Scott Endersby]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]). Self nom at 08:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]). Self nom at 08:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)</small> |
Latest revision as of 21:07, 5 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Redtigerxyz Talk 17:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
David Gwilym Morris Roberts
- ... that David Gwilym Morris Roberts helped design Baghdad's first sewage treatment system?
Created/expanded by Dumelow (talk). Self nom at 08:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
New enough and long enough at time of nomination. QPQ done. Hook is properly formatted. Spot check of online sources shows no problems with plagiarism. Hooked fact is found in article. Hook is interesting enough. Article is neutral enough. No images to check copyright on.
Offline sources support text and were not plagiarised to write. This includes hooked fact. Topic is notable. --LauraHale (talk) 10:58, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
