Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/David Malet Armstrong"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>ThaddeusB m (typo) |
imported>Tom Morris (response) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:::*If it was a matter of just the stub classification ([[Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Supplementary_guidelines|DYK rule D11]]) I would have fixed it myself and quickly okayed the DYK nomination. In this case, however, some paragraphs are unreferenced (DYK rule D2) and the nominator (or someone else) needs to add a reference to them. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 12:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC) | :::*If it was a matter of just the stub classification ([[Wikipedia:Did_you_know/Supplementary_guidelines|DYK rule D11]]) I would have fixed it myself and quickly okayed the DYK nomination. In this case, however, some paragraphs are unreferenced (DYK rule D2) and the nominator (or someone else) needs to add a reference to them. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 12:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::*Yes I realize that a stub classification wasn't the ''only'' issue, but it was listed as ''a'' issue. --[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC) | ::::*Yes I realize that a stub classification wasn't the ''only'' issue, but it was listed as ''a'' issue. --[[User:ThaddeusB|ThaddeusB]] ([[User talk:ThaddeusB|talk]]) 19:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::* I'll add some references tommorrow. I've been a bit busy at work. I'll ping Binksternet once I've fixed the issues. —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 16:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 16:42, 25 April 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
David Malet Armstrong
- ... that Australian philosopher David Malet Armstrong believes that every truth has a truthmaker?
- Reviewed: Bizhu dance
5x expanded by Tom Morris (talk). Self nominated at 07:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC).
- 16px Article must be changed from stub classification for DYK. The cited fact is cited to Armstrong's own writing, which is okay but not as good as if a WP:Secondary source commented on his view. The expansion from 2127 characters to 10866 is sufficient (5x). There are some paragraphs without references, so I will give this nomination a chance to come up to the DYK bar. Binksternet (talk) 15:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- It's OK to use some common sense - an article with 10k of prose is never a stub, even if the talk page WikiProject tags have not been updated. --ThaddeusB (talk) 11:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- If it was a matter of just the stub classification (DYK rule D11) I would have fixed it myself and quickly okayed the DYK nomination. In this case, however, some paragraphs are unreferenced (DYK rule D2) and the nominator (or someone else) needs to add a reference to them. Binksternet (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes I realize that a stub classification wasn't the only issue, but it was listed as a issue. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'll add some references tommorrow. I've been a bit busy at work. I'll ping Binksternet once I've fixed the issues. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
