Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/David fitzGerald"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dahn
(check and suggestions)
imported>Ealdgyth
(reply)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Date, length verified, AGFed on the hook and the paraphrasing. I would like to see the colloquialism "a bit murky" replaced with something a bit more elegant, but that's not a major issue. The hook also seems a bit bland to me, so, if I may, Imna propose another (that I think someone else will have to approve?):
 
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Date, length verified, AGFed on the hook and the paraphrasing. I would like to see the colloquialism "a bit murky" replaced with something a bit more elegant, but that's not a major issue. The hook also seems a bit bland to me, so, if I may, Imna propose another (that I think someone else will have to approve?):
 
::*ALT 1: ... that, in exchange for securing [[Wales|Welsh]] interests within the [[Bishop of St David's|See of St David's]], Bishop '''[[David fitzGerald]]''' renounced efforts for its elevation into an archbishopric? [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 18:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 
::*ALT 1: ... that, in exchange for securing [[Wales|Welsh]] interests within the [[Bishop of St David's|See of St David's]], Bishop '''[[David fitzGerald]]''' renounced efforts for its elevation into an archbishopric? [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 18:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 
+
:::* I'm fine with either... [[User:Ealdgyth|Ealdgyth]] - [[User talk:Ealdgyth|Talk]] 18:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:40, 16 March 2012

David fitzGerald

Created/expanded by Ealdgyth (talk). Self nom at 15:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Date, length verified, AGFed on the hook and the paraphrasing. I would like to see the colloquialism "a bit murky" replaced with something a bit more elegant, but that's not a major issue. The hook also seems a bit bland to me, so, if I may, Imna propose another (that I think someone else will have to approve?):
  • I'm fine with either... Ealdgyth - Talk 18:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC)