Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dawpool (house)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter I. Vardy
(Response to Seattle)
imported>Seattle
(re)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
:::{{ping|Peter I. Vardy}} Have you made any progress on reviewing another hook? [[User:Seattle|Seattle]] ([[User talk:Seattle|talk]]) 23:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:::{{ping|Peter I. Vardy}} Have you made any progress on reviewing another hook? [[User:Seattle|Seattle]] ([[User talk:Seattle|talk]]) 23:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 
::::{{ping|Seattle}} Not sure what more you want me to do.  I'm OK with any of the hooks. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 09:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 
::::{{ping|Seattle}} Not sure what more you want me to do.  I'm OK with any of the hooks. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 09:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 +
:::::{{ping|Peter I. Vardy}} I want you to review a proposed did you know hook article per the QPQ rules as established under [[Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria]] rule No. 5. You never edited [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Suquamish_Museum&action=history the Suquamish Museum proposed hook]; can you show me where you reviewed the hook? Don't be so brash. [[User:Seattle|Seattle]] ([[User talk:Seattle|talk]]) 10:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 
*It's a commonplace that houses slated for demolition get cannibalized for parts.  
 
*It's a commonplace that houses slated for demolition get cannibalized for parts.  
 
::'''ALT2''' ... that [[Thomas Henry Ismay]]'s wife said that '''[[Dawpool (house)|Dawpool]]''' had "served its purpose in keeping [her husband] amused for fifteen years"?
 
::'''ALT2''' ... that [[Thomas Henry Ismay]]'s wife said that '''[[Dawpool (house)|Dawpool]]''' had "served its purpose in keeping [her husband] amused for fifteen years"?

Revision as of 10:09, 29 December 2014

Dawpool (house)

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nominated at 17:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Article created on December 17, 3,013 characters. Article is neutral, cites in-line sources well, attributes quotes about the house to their authors in-line with WP:INTEXT. Both hooks lie under the 200 character mark, are interesting. According to [1], Ismay did not found White Star Line, but purchased it for £1,000. I would prefer "in" be changed to "from" in the first hook, as it's a year range. Source supports first hook. Source also supports second hook. No images; the reviewed article links to a review by another user. I'm putting this on hold until nominator reviews another hook, and nominator fixes Ismay's role in relation to White Star. Seattle (talk) 23:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Fair point. I've amended the article and the original hook. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Ping Have you made any progress on reviewing another hook? Seattle (talk) 23:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Ping Not sure what more you want me to do. I'm OK with any of the hooks. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:58, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Template:Ping I want you to review a proposed did you know hook article per the QPQ rules as established under Wikipedia:Did you know#Eligibility criteria rule No. 5. You never edited the Suquamish Museum proposed hook; can you show me where you reviewed the hook? Don't be so brash. Seattle (talk) 10:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
  • It's a commonplace that houses slated for demolition get cannibalized for parts.
ALT2 ... that Thomas Henry Ismay's wife said that Dawpool had "served its purpose in keeping [her husband] amused for fifteen years"?
EEng (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)