Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Der Handschuh (Waterhouse)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Volunteer Marek |
imported>Volunteer Marek |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
*{{DYKmake|Der Handschuh (Waterhouse)|Gerda Arendt}} | *{{DYKmake|Der Handschuh (Waterhouse)|Gerda Arendt}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
--> | --> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
:*<!--Make first comment here--> | :*<!--Make first comment here--> | ||
| + | *Everything checks out, and AGF on the German. One thing though. The article is mostly based on a self-published source, the composer's website [http://www.arbc.de/Waterhouse/werke.htm#handschuh] (I think). Since I'm not seeing anything potentially controversial info in the article, I think that's ok, but it could use some more secondary sources. There's also a long-ish direct quote in the "Plot and composition" which should be paraphrased. If it is paraphrased and nobody else has a problem with the major source being SP then I'll tick this off.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font style="color:blue;background:orange;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Volunteer Marek '''</font>]]</span></small> 15:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 15 November 2011
Der Handschuh (Waterhouse)
- ... that the composition by Graham Waterhouse Der Handschuh (The Glove) for cello and speaking voice, after Schiller's ballad Der Handschuh, is designed for one performer?
- Reviewed: Fatty Finn, I also reviewed HMS Harvester (H19)
Created/expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 12:50, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Everything checks out, and AGF on the German. One thing though. The article is mostly based on a self-published source, the composer's website [1] (I think). Since I'm not seeing anything potentially controversial info in the article, I think that's ok, but it could use some more secondary sources. There's also a long-ish direct quote in the "Plot and composition" which should be paraphrased. If it is paraphrased and nobody else has a problem with the major source being SP then I'll tick this off. Volunteer Marek 15:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)