Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dermophis mexicanus"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>PFHLai
(to P2)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[[File:Dermophis mexicanus.jpg|100x100px|Mexican burrowing caecilian]]
 
[[File:Dermophis mexicanus.jpg|100x100px|Mexican burrowing caecilian]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
{{*mp}}... that the '''[[Dermophis mexicanus|Mexican burrowing caecilian]]''' ''(pictured)'' is [[Vivipary|viviparous]] with the young feeding on glandular secretions in the [[oviduct]]?
+
*... that the '''[[Dermophis mexicanus|Mexican burrowing caecilian]]''' ''(pictured)'' is [[Vivipary|viviparous]] with the young feeding on glandular secretions in the [[oviduct]]?
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Geology of Dorset|Geology of Dorset]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Geology of Dorset|Geology of Dorset]]
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]).  Self nom at 17:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]).  Self nom at 17:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)</small>

Latest revision as of 21:15, 5 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 21:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Dermophis mexicanus

Mexican burrowing caecilian

Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nom at 17:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svgHook fact and length are good. Article 5x expansion is good. References check with no policy issues found. Image status checks out. Good to go. --Kevmin § 18:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)