Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Development of Red Dead Redemption"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Allen3 (to prep6) |
imported>KolbertBot m (Bot: HTTP→HTTPS (v475)) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:* '''ALT2''':... that the five-year '''[[Development of Red Dead Redemption|development of ''Red Dead Redemption'']]''' was met with complaints from some staff claiming unethical working practices? | :* '''ALT2''':... that the five-year '''[[Development of Red Dead Redemption|development of ''Red Dead Redemption'']]''' was met with complaints from some staff claiming unethical working practices? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V|Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V|Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V]] | ||
− | :* ''Comment'': [http://www.gamespot.com/articles/breaking-in-the-digital-horses-of-red-dead-redemption/1100-6261863/ Hook source], [ | + | :* ''Comment'': [http://www.gamespot.com/articles/breaking-in-the-digital-horses-of-red-dead-redemption/1100-6261863/ Hook source], [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/arts/television/17dead.html ALT1 source], [http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/RockstarSpouse/20100107/4032/Wives_of_Rockstar_San_Diego_employees_have_collected_themselves.php ALT2 source] |
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Rhain1999|Rhain1999]] ([[User talk:Rhain1999|talk]]). Self nominated at 06:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Rhain1999|Rhain1999]] ([[User talk:Rhain1999|talk]]). Self nominated at 06:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)</small>. | ||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was improved to GA status. Article is 22490 characters. QPQ has been carried out. I think '''ALT1''' is the best option; sourced and cited. Meets other policies too. — [[User:Calvin999|<font color="#126180">₳aron</font>]] 21:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was improved to GA status. Article is 22490 characters. QPQ has been carried out. I think '''ALT1''' is the best option; sourced and cited. Meets other policies too. — [[User:Calvin999|<font color="#126180">₳aron</font>]] 21:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 04:39, 3 November 2017
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Development of Red Dead Redemption
- ... that the development team motion captured a horse during the development of Red Dead Redemption?
- ALT1:... that the budget for the development of Red Dead Redemption was estimated between US$80 million and US$100 million?
- ALT2:... that the five-year development of Red Dead Redemption was met with complaints from some staff claiming unethical working practices?
- Reviewed: Controversies surrounding Grand Theft Auto V
- Comment: Hook source, ALT1 source, ALT2 source
Improved to Good Article status by Rhain1999 (talk). Self nominated at 06:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC).
Article was improved to GA status. Article is 22490 characters. QPQ has been carried out. I think ALT1 is the best option; sourced and cited. Meets other policies too. — ₳aron 21:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)