Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Directed acyclic graph"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Eppstein (New DYK nom) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Passed for DYK) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] This article is a newly promoted GA. It is long enough and nominated in the correct timeframe. The hook facts have inline citations and the article is neutral. Most of the sources are inaccessible to me so I was unable to check for copyright issues. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 05:18, 4 June 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Directed acyclic graph
- ... that because of pedigree collapse, some family trees are better modeled mathematically as directed acyclic graphs than as trees?
- Reviewed: Habitat
Improved to Good Article status by David Eppstein (talk). Self-nominated at 00:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC).
This article is a newly promoted GA. It is long enough and nominated in the correct timeframe. The hook facts have inline citations and the article is neutral. Most of the sources are inaccessible to me so I was unable to check for copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 4 June 2016 (UTC)