Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dirtbag left"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>FourViolas
(would accept, but first question the necessity of the f-bomb)
imported>Morgan695
Line 21: Line 21:
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough. An excellent article in terms of policy compliance: well-cited, informative, and presenting a range of views on a controversial topic in an evenhanded manner. Earwig only identifies direct quotes. QPQ complete.
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough. An excellent article in terms of policy compliance: well-cited, informative, and presenting a range of views on a controversial topic in an evenhanded manner. Earwig only identifies direct quotes. QPQ complete.
 
:: Hook is short enough, cited, provocative, and neutral in that both admirers and critics of the article topic would be likely to find it apt. I suspect I already know the answer, but for the reasons described at [[WP:NOTCENSORED and the Main Page]], I would be remiss if I didn't ask the author to consider offering an alternative hook without an f-bomb. (Prior consensus seems to be to discourage offensive hooks if alternatives are available; see [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/Archive_105#Proposed_rewording_of_rules]].) [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 21:15, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 
:: Hook is short enough, cited, provocative, and neutral in that both admirers and critics of the article topic would be likely to find it apt. I suspect I already know the answer, but for the reasons described at [[WP:NOTCENSORED and the Main Page]], I would be remiss if I didn't ask the author to consider offering an alternative hook without an f-bomb. (Prior consensus seems to be to discourage offensive hooks if alternatives are available; see [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/Archive_105#Proposed_rewording_of_rules]].) [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 21:15, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 
+
::*My sense is that more recent discussions on this err on the side of [[WP:NOTCENSORED]]; see the [[Template:Did you know nominations/17 Million Fuck Offs|DYK nomination for "17 Million Fuck Offs"]] from last month, which did use "fuck" in the hook. [[User:Morgan695|Morgan695]] ([[User talk:Morgan695|talk]]) 21:35, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:36, 21 May 2020

Dirtbag left

  • Reviewed: Ikeda Route
  • Comment: Hook is a quote from Will Menaker, co-host of Chapo Trap House and a major figure associated with the dirtbag left.

Converted from a redirect by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough. An excellent article in terms of policy compliance: well-cited, informative, and presenting a range of views on a controversial topic in an evenhanded manner. Earwig only identifies direct quotes. QPQ complete.
Hook is short enough, cited, provocative, and neutral in that both admirers and critics of the article topic would be likely to find it apt. I suspect I already know the answer, but for the reasons described at WP:NOTCENSORED and the Main Page, I would be remiss if I didn't ask the author to consider offering an alternative hook without an f-bomb. (Prior consensus seems to be to discourage offensive hooks if alternatives are available; see Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/Archive_105#Proposed_rewording_of_rules.) FourViolas (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2020 (UTC)