Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dominic Tweddle"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Moonraker (Tweak) |
imported>Usernameunique (Comment) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The text of the article, which I believe is what counts, is five times expanded. Well-cited throughout, neutrally written, no signs of copyvio. Hook is cited to two online sources — one written by the subject of the article, but a reliable source not self-published, so I see no objection. I do have a quibble with the link to [[Late Roman ridge helmet]], which is surely off-topic? That link would perhaps be better left out when this comes to be promoted, or we might say "post-[[Late Roman ridge helmet|Roman]] helmet types"? QPQ done, image is licensed. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 10:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The text of the article, which I believe is what counts, is five times expanded. Well-cited throughout, neutrally written, no signs of copyvio. Hook is cited to two online sources — one written by the subject of the article, but a reliable source not self-published, so I see no objection. I do have a quibble with the link to [[Late Roman ridge helmet]], which is surely off-topic? That link would perhaps be better left out when this comes to be promoted, or we might say "post-[[Late Roman ridge helmet|Roman]] helmet types"? QPQ done, image is licensed. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 10:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::*Happy with either version. The Coppergate helmet is a stylistic derivative of late Roman ridge helmets, so I don't think the link is off topic. --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 21:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 21:27, 11 March 2018
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dominic Tweddle
- ... that before becoming director of the National Museum of the Royal Navy, Dominic Tweddle helped excavate the Coppergate helmet (pictured), and published a chronology of post-Roman helmet types? Source: Tweddle 1992 is all about the excavation. Per Härke 1993, Tweddle wrote "a wide-ranging survey, from Pictland to Kiev, of post-Roman helmet types, their distributions and their dating."
- Reviewed: Willem Ravelli
5x expanded by Usernameunique (talk). Self-nominated at 21:02, 10 March 2018 (UTC).
The text of the article, which I believe is what counts, is five times expanded. Well-cited throughout, neutrally written, no signs of copyvio. Hook is cited to two online sources — one written by the subject of the article, but a reliable source not self-published, so I see no objection. I do have a quibble with the link to Late Roman ridge helmet, which is surely off-topic? That link would perhaps be better left out when this comes to be promoted, or we might say "post-Roman helmet types"? QPQ done, image is licensed. Moonraker (talk) 10:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Happy with either version. The Coppergate helmet is a stylistic derivative of late Roman ridge helmets, so I don't think the link is off topic. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
