Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dorothy Proctor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nikkimaria (re) |
imported>PFHLai (to P1) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 04:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)<br />}} |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====Dorothy Proctor==== | ====Dorothy Proctor==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Dorothy Proctor|Dorothy Proctor}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Dorothy Proctor|Dorothy Proctor}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that a suit by '''[[Dorothy Proctor]]''' led to the revelation that hundreds of Canadian prisoners had been subjects of scientific experiments? | * ... that a suit by '''[[Dorothy Proctor]]''' led to the revelation that hundreds of Canadian prisoners had been subjects of scientific experiments? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/The Doughnut|The Doughnut]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/The Doughnut|The Doughnut]] | ||
:* ''Comment'': '''ALT1''' ... that '''[[Dorothy Proctor]]''' claimed to have infiltrated the Mafia and a Sikh terrorist group? | :* ''Comment'': '''ALT1''' ... that '''[[Dorothy Proctor]]''' claimed to have infiltrated the Mafia and a Sikh terrorist group? | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]). Self nominated at 05:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]). Self nominated at 05:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article is new and long enough at 1851 bytes of prose. It is written neutrally and complies with BLP. The hook is properly formatted and fewer than 200 characters. Offline sources accepted in good faith. QPQ has been done. No copyvios or close paraphrasing were detected. Original hook is preferred over ALT1, due partly to the use of 'claim' (see [[WP:CLAIM]]). | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article is new and long enough at 1851 bytes of prose. It is written neutrally and complies with BLP. The hook is properly formatted and fewer than 200 characters. Offline sources accepted in good faith. QPQ has been done. No copyvios or close paraphrasing were detected. Original hook is preferred over ALT1, due partly to the use of 'claim' (see [[WP:CLAIM]]). | ||
::{{ping|Nikkimaria}} It might be worth noting that while the suit may have been dismissed, it was also settled out of court, at least according to her [http://ckuttimecapsule.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/dorothy-proctor-a-survivor-of-prison-experiments/ interview on CKUT]. [[User:Gobonobo|<font face="DejaVu Sans" color="333300">Gobōnobō</font>]] [[User_talk:Gobonobo|<sup>+</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gobonobo|<sup>c</sup>]] 08:10, 11 January 2014 (UTC) | ::{{ping|Nikkimaria}} It might be worth noting that while the suit may have been dismissed, it was also settled out of court, at least according to her [http://ckuttimecapsule.wordpress.com/2013/05/02/dorothy-proctor-a-survivor-of-prison-experiments/ interview on CKUT]. [[User:Gobonobo|<font face="DejaVu Sans" color="333300">Gobōnobō</font>]] [[User_talk:Gobonobo|<sup>+</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Gobonobo|<sup>c</sup>]] 08:10, 11 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
− | :::Understood. "Claim" was deliberate, simply because of the nature of the source - I haven't found anything independent of the autobiography to confirm it. But using the original is fine, and I've added the CKUT source. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 17:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC) | + | :::Understood. "Claim" was deliberate, simply because of the nature of the source - I haven't found anything independent of the autobiography to confirm it. But using the original is fine, and I've added the CKUT source. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 17:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− | |||
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 04:44, 17 January 2014
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 04:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Dorothy Proctor
- ... that a suit by Dorothy Proctor led to the revelation that hundreds of Canadian prisoners had been subjects of scientific experiments?
- Reviewed: The Doughnut
- Comment: ALT1 ... that Dorothy Proctor claimed to have infiltrated the Mafia and a Sikh terrorist group?
Created by Nikkimaria (talk). Self nominated at 05:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC).
Article is new and long enough at 1851 bytes of prose. It is written neutrally and complies with BLP. The hook is properly formatted and fewer than 200 characters. Offline sources accepted in good faith. QPQ has been done. No copyvios or close paraphrasing were detected. Original hook is preferred over ALT1, due partly to the use of 'claim' (see WP:CLAIM).
- Template:Ping It might be worth noting that while the suit may have been dismissed, it was also settled out of court, at least according to her interview on CKUT. Gobōnobō + c 08:10, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Understood. "Claim" was deliberate, simply because of the nature of the source - I haven't found anything independent of the autobiography to confirm it. But using the original is fine, and I've added the CKUT source. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC)