Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dry Creek explosives depot"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>7&6=thirteen
(more)
imported>Allen3
(add closing surly braces)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
|qpq          = n
 
|qpq          = n
 
|status      = y
 
|status      = y
|comments    = Passes DYK checklist.
+
|comments    = Passes DYK checklist.}}
  
 
* '''Review''' [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism.  DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough.  Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report gives it a clean bill. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Dry+Creek+explosives+depot&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig].  IMO, there is now no close paraphrasing, and the highest related source is public domain.  The hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article.  It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited.  Picture is free to use.  QPQ not required, as nominator has fewer than five nominations. In any event, I am donating: [[Template:Did you know nominations/North American Piedmontese cattle]],  [[User:Bahudhara]] should be added as a co-creator, I think.  <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 11:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)   
 
* '''Review''' [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism.  DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough.  Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report gives it a clean bill. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Dry+Creek+explosives+depot&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig].  IMO, there is now no close paraphrasing, and the highest related source is public domain.  The hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article.  It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited.  Picture is free to use.  QPQ not required, as nominator has fewer than five nominations. In any event, I am donating: [[Template:Did you know nominations/North American Piedmontese cattle]],  [[User:Bahudhara]] should be added as a co-creator, I think.  <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 11:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)   
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 12:11, 12 March 2015

Dry Creek explosives depot

Horse-drawn explosives carrying wagon in the Dry Creek Explosive Magazine in South Australia

Created by NearEMPTiness (talk). Self nominated at 19:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC).

  • DYK checklist template

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

  • Review Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report gives it a clean bill. Earwig. IMO, there is now no close paraphrasing, and the highest related source is public domain. The hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. Picture is free to use. QPQ not required, as nominator has fewer than five nominations. In any event, I am donating: Template:Did you know nominations/North American Piedmontese cattle, User:Bahudhara should be added as a co-creator, I think. 7&6=thirteen () 11:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)