Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dry Creek explosives depot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>7&6=thirteen (more) |
imported>Allen3 (add closing surly braces) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|qpq = n | |qpq = n | ||
|status = y | |status = y | ||
| − | |comments = Passes DYK checklist. | + | |comments = Passes DYK checklist.}} |
* '''Review''' [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report gives it a clean bill. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Dry+Creek+explosives+depot&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig]. IMO, there is now no close paraphrasing, and the highest related source is public domain. The hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. Picture is free to use. QPQ not required, as nominator has fewer than five nominations. In any event, I am donating: [[Template:Did you know nominations/North American Piedmontese cattle]], [[User:Bahudhara]] should be added as a co-creator, I think. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 11:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | * '''Review''' [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report gives it a clean bill. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Dry+Creek+explosives+depot&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 Earwig]. IMO, there is now no close paraphrasing, and the highest related source is public domain. The hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. Picture is free to use. QPQ not required, as nominator has fewer than five nominations. In any event, I am donating: [[Template:Did you know nominations/North American Piedmontese cattle]], [[User:Bahudhara]] should be added as a co-creator, I think. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 11:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 12:11, 12 March 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dry Creek explosives depot
- ... that a horse-drawn tram (pictured) was used to get dynamite to and from the Dry Creek explosives depot?
Created by NearEMPTiness (talk). Self nominated at 19:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC).
- Comment Review under way. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- DYK checklist template
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Review
Good to go! Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Hook references are verified and cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector report gives it a clean bill. Earwig. IMO, there is now no close paraphrasing, and the highest related source is public domain. The hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. Picture is free to use. QPQ not required, as nominator has fewer than five nominations. In any event, I am donating: Template:Did you know nominations/North American Piedmontese cattle, User:Bahudhara should be added as a co-creator, I think. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
