Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Duellmanohyla soralia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>JMiall (review) |
imported>Thine Antique Pen (re and tick) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:*x5 expansion OK, rest of article seems OK, I can't access the journal article, only the abstract - this doesn't really support the hook as it only claims that the frogs have the fungus and are critically endangered, not that the fungus has caused this.<span style="background:lightgrey;font-family:Courier;border:2px dashed #000;">[[User:JMiall|<font color="purple">JMiall</font>]][[User talk:JMiall|<font color="red">₰</font>]]</span> 12:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC) | :*x5 expansion OK, rest of article seems OK, I can't access the journal article, only the abstract - this doesn't really support the hook as it only claims that the frogs have the fungus and are critically endangered, not that the fungus has caused this.<span style="background:lightgrey;font-family:Courier;border:2px dashed #000;">[[User:JMiall|<font color="purple">JMiall</font>]][[User talk:JMiall|<font color="red">₰</font>]]</span> 12:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ::*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] [[WP:PAYWALL|Offline sources are permitted]], even though you might only be able to see some of them. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Expansion is good and QPQ is done. Good to go. [[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]) 12:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 12:52, 27 October 2012
Duellmanohyla soralia
- ... that the Central American frog Duellmanohyla soralia is critically endangered and its population decline is due, at least in part, to the fungal disease chytridiomycosis?
- Reviewed: Constance Lewes
Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nom at 17:51, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
- x5 expansion OK, rest of article seems OK, I can't access the journal article, only the abstract - this doesn't really support the hook as it only claims that the frogs have the fungus and are critically endangered, not that the fungus has caused this.JMiall₰ 12:49, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Offline sources are permitted, even though you might only be able to see some of them.
Expansion is good and QPQ is done. Good to go. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)