Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dyrham Park"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 5) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Is there a better source available for the mention in the last paragraph of a Doctor Who episode being filmed there? The source quotes a cast member saying he only thinks it was Dryham Park. The cited sources in the Public access section don't appear to verify all of the information (I can't see anything on Easter egg hunts or Perry Pear Day), probably because the sources have been updated to show newer events so perhaps alternative or archive citations are needed. | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Is there a better source available for the mention in the last paragraph of a Doctor Who episode being filmed there? The source quotes a cast member saying he only thinks it was Dryham Park. The cited sources in the Public access section don't appear to verify all of the information (I can't see anything on Easter egg hunts or Perry Pear Day), probably because the sources have been updated to show newer events so perhaps alternative or archive citations are needed. | ||
::*I have added more references for Dr Who & the family atrraction events - but I don't think they are key to the article about the house so could be removed if the new references are not up to scratch (I'm not sure Anglotopia Magazine would could as RS).— [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 17:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC) | ::*I have added more references for Dr Who & the family atrraction events - but I don't think they are key to the article about the house so could be removed if the new references are not up to scratch (I'm not sure Anglotopia Magazine would could as RS).— [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 17:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::*I don't think it would pass either unfortunately, it seems to be a self-published site. < | + | :::*I don't think it would pass either unfortunately, it seems to be a self-published site. [[User:January|<span style="color:navy;">January</span>]] <small>([[User talk:January|<span style="color:navy;">talk</span>]])</small> 18:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC) |
| − | ::Otherwise, the article is newly-promoted to GA and meets the length requirement, hook is cited, the image used in the hook and others used in the article are suitably licensed, QPQ is done. The suspected copyvio that the bot picked up is a [[WP:BACKWARDSCOPY|backwards copy]] so this is fine, no close paraphrasing found elsewhere. < | + | ::Otherwise, the article is newly-promoted to GA and meets the length requirement, hook is cited, the image used in the hook and others used in the article are suitably licensed, QPQ is done. The suspected copyvio that the bot picked up is a [[WP:BACKWARDSCOPY|backwards copy]] so this is fine, no close paraphrasing found elsewhere. [[User:January|<span style="color:navy;">January</span>]] <small>([[User talk:January|<span style="color:navy;">talk</span>]])</small> 17:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC) |
| − | ::Is the paragraph in the history section beginning "Owing to Blathwayt's royal connections ..." missing a citation? The only part I can see confirmed by the source at the end of the paragraph is the part about George London. Doctor Who cite is now OK. < | + | ::Is the paragraph in the history section beginning "Owing to Blathwayt's royal connections ..." missing a citation? The only part I can see confirmed by the source at the end of the paragraph is the part about George London. Doctor Who cite is now OK. [[User:January|<span style="color:navy;">January</span>]] <small>([[User talk:January|<span style="color:navy;">talk</span>]])</small> 18:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC) |
:::I've added some refs showing Blathwayt & Poveys relationship + dutch paintings. (Also removed Easter egg hunts or Perry Pear Day & non-RS source).— [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 18:12, 31 August 2016 (UTC) | :::I've added some refs showing Blathwayt & Poveys relationship + dutch paintings. (Also removed Easter egg hunts or Perry Pear Day & non-RS source).— [[User:Rodw|Rod]] <sup>[[User talk:Rodw|talk]]</sup> 18:12, 31 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Issues resolved, ready to go. < | + | ::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Issues resolved, ready to go. [[User:January|<span style="color:navy;">January</span>]] <small>([[User talk:January|<span style="color:navy;">talk</span>]])</small> 18:41, 31 August 2016 (UTC) |
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 08:45, 15 January 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dyrham Park
- Reviewed: The Gladstone Arms
Improved to Good Article status by Rodw (talk). Nominated by Cwmhiraeth (talk) at 06:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC).
- REDIRECT Template:•
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article was Listed as a Good Article on 12:56, 28 August 2016
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 7474 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 47.6% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- REDIRECT Template:•No overall issues detected
- ✓ The media File:Dyrham Park lower park.jpg is free-use
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 79 characters
- ✓ Cwmhiraeth has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/The Gladstone Arms was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 07:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Is there a better source available for the mention in the last paragraph of a Doctor Who episode being filmed there? The source quotes a cast member saying he only thinks it was Dryham Park. The cited sources in the Public access section don't appear to verify all of the information (I can't see anything on Easter egg hunts or Perry Pear Day), probably because the sources have been updated to show newer events so perhaps alternative or archive citations are needed.
- Otherwise, the article is newly-promoted to GA and meets the length requirement, hook is cited, the image used in the hook and others used in the article are suitably licensed, QPQ is done. The suspected copyvio that the bot picked up is a backwards copy so this is fine, no close paraphrasing found elsewhere. January (talk) 17:06, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Is the paragraph in the history section beginning "Owing to Blathwayt's royal connections ..." missing a citation? The only part I can see confirmed by the source at the end of the paragraph is the part about George London. Doctor Who cite is now OK. January (talk) 18:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
