Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Dysidea arenaria"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Kevmin (good to go) |
imported>Maile66 (promoted to prep 6) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from September 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 20:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Dysidea arenaria==== | ====Dysidea arenaria==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Dysidea arenaria|Dysidea arenaria}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Dysidea arenaria|Dysidea arenaria}} | ||
| − | + | * ...<s>that the marine [[sponge]] '''''[[Dysidea arenaria]]''''' was originally discovered in [[Palau]]?</s> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | * ... that the marine [[sponge]] '''''[[Dysidea arenaria]]''''' was originally discovered in [[Palau]]? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2016 United States federal budget|2016 United States federal budget]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2016 United States federal budget|2016 United States federal budget]] | ||
:* ''Comment'': OK, I tried; I couldn't come up with a chemistry hook that anyone but me would click on. | :* ''Comment'': OK, I tried; I couldn't come up with a chemistry hook that anyone but me would click on. | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]). Self-nominated at 03:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]). Self-nominated at 03:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Article long enough and new enough. Citations are in place and neutral, with the hook cited to a reliable source. I might suggest changing "discovered in" to "described from" given the article doesn't mention the dates or locations that specimens were collected from (Do we know that the Palau specimens were the first to be collected, even though they were the first to be described?)--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 23:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Article long enough and new enough. Citations are in place and neutral, with the hook cited to a reliable source. I might suggest changing "discovered in" to "described from" given the article doesn't mention the dates or locations that specimens were collected from (Do we know that the Palau specimens were the first to be collected, even though they were the first to be described?)--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 23:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| Line 25: | Line 17: | ||
:::That's not all that unusual for weird marine fauna, but sounds a little more interesting? [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]) 01:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | :::That's not all that unusual for weird marine fauna, but sounds a little more interesting? [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]) 01:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::I know how that is indeed, my articles are all on fossil insect taxa, so it very common for new taxa descriptions to be made on specimens that were collected decades earlier. | ::::I know how that is indeed, my articles are all on fossil insect taxa, so it very common for new taxa descriptions to be made on specimens that were collected decades earlier. | ||
| − | ::::[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]]Article long enough and new enough. Citations are in place and neutral, with the hook cited to a reliable source. Referecnes are offline/paywalled so I assume good faith on the hook and the lack of policy violations. Alt one hook good to go.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 19:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC) | + | ::::[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]]Article long enough and new enough. Citations are in place and neutral, with the hook cited to a reliable source. Referecnes are offline/paywalled so I assume good faith on the hook and the lack of policy violations. Alt one hook good to go.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 19:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 20:58, 21 September 2015
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dysidea arenaria
- ...
that the marine sponge Dysidea arenaria was originally discovered in Palau?
- Reviewed: 2016 United States federal budget
- Comment: OK, I tried; I couldn't come up with a chemistry hook that anyone but me would click on.
Created by Opabinia regalis (talk). Self-nominated at 03:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC).
Article long enough and new enough. Citations are in place and neutral, with the hook cited to a reliable source. I might suggest changing "discovered in" to "described from" given the article doesn't mention the dates or locations that specimens were collected from (Do we know that the Palau specimens were the first to be collected, even though they were the first to be described?)--Kevmin § 23:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping The Palau project started in 1955 and the first description was published in 1965 (Bergquist). I don't think it's possible to exclude its unnoticed presence in earlier collections from other locations. It's true that the concept of 'discovering' a species is a little squishy. How about:
- ALT1: ... that the marine sponge Dysidea arenaria was originally described based on a single specimen collected near Palau?
- That's not all that unusual for weird marine fauna, but sounds a little more interesting? Opabinia regalis (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I know how that is indeed, my articles are all on fossil insect taxa, so it very common for new taxa descriptions to be made on specimens that were collected decades earlier.
Article long enough and new enough. Citations are in place and neutral, with the hook cited to a reliable source. Referecnes are offline/paywalled so I assume good faith on the hook and the lack of policy violations. Alt one hook good to go.--Kevmin § 19:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping The Palau project started in 1955 and the first description was published in 1965 (Bergquist). I don't think it's possible to exclude its unnoticed presence in earlier collections from other locations. It's true that the concept of 'discovering' a species is a little squishy. How about: