Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/EMD F40PH"
imported>Futurist110 |
imported>Futurist110 |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Maybe I am missing something here, but it looks like this DYK? nomination simply doesn't meet the necessary criteria for this; after all, it was neither created nor expanded five-fold within seven days of this DYK? nomination being made. Indeed, can someone here please double-check this? [[User:Futurist110|Futurist110]] ([[User talk:Futurist110|talk]]) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | :[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Maybe I am missing something here, but it looks like this DYK? nomination simply doesn't meet the necessary criteria for this; after all, it was neither created nor expanded five-fold within seven days of this DYK? nomination being made. Indeed, can someone here please double-check this? [[User:Futurist110|Futurist110]] ([[User talk:Futurist110|talk]]) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
::{{ping|Futurist110}} it was promoted to good article status within the past seven days. [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 20:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | ::{{ping|Futurist110}} it was promoted to good article status within the past seven days. [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 20:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
− | :::I'm sorry; I didn't see that. [[User:Futurist110|Futurist110]] ([[User talk:Futurist110|talk]]) 01:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | + | :::I'm sorry; I didn't see that. :( [[User:Futurist110|Futurist110]] ([[User talk:Futurist110|talk]]) 01:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC) |
I love the '''ATL1''' suggestion. It would be a good joke on [[April Fool's Day]]. [[User:FunksBrother|FunksBrother]] ([[User talk:FunksBrother|talk]]) 18:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | I love the '''ATL1''' suggestion. It would be a good joke on [[April Fool's Day]]. [[User:FunksBrother|FunksBrother]] ([[User talk:FunksBrother|talk]]) 18:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, that would have been great had this DYK? nomination actually qualified. [[User:Futurist110|Futurist110]] ([[User talk:Futurist110|talk]]) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC) | :Yes, that would have been great had this DYK? nomination actually qualified. [[User:Futurist110|Futurist110]] ([[User talk:Futurist110|talk]]) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:10, 10 March 2017
DYK toolbox |
---|
EMD F40PH

- ... that the EMD F40PH (pictured) diesel locomotive appears on the Canadian ten-dollar note? Source: More plastic for your wallet: A look at Canada's new polymer bills
- ALT1:... that in Canada, ten dollars will get you an EMD F40PH (pictured) diesel locomotive?
- Reviewed: François Bott
- Comment: I'd like to hold this for April 9, when the model entered service.
Improved to Good Article status by Mackensen (talk). Self-nominated at 02:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC).
Maybe I am missing something here, but it looks like this DYK? nomination simply doesn't meet the necessary criteria for this; after all, it was neither created nor expanded five-fold within seven days of this DYK? nomination being made. Indeed, can someone here please double-check this? Futurist110 (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping it was promoted to good article status within the past seven days. Mackensen (talk) 20:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry; I didn't see that. :( Futurist110 (talk) 01:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping it was promoted to good article status within the past seven days. Mackensen (talk) 20:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
I love the ATL1 suggestion. It would be a good joke on April Fool's Day. FunksBrother (talk) 18:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that would have been great had this DYK? nomination actually qualified. Futurist110 (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:DYK "Articles designated as Good articles within the past seven days, regardless of whether they were expanded, are also eligible." This article achieved GA status March 8, 2017. Template:U If you wish to use this as a QPQ credit, please provide a review that covers the DYK criteria. For your convenience, at the top of this template in the DYK Toolbox is a Reviewer's template that lists each of the criteria required for a review. Thank you for your participation. — Maile (talk) 21:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Length, Date, Cite, QPQ, and Earwigs check. Image is freely licensed and logged in OTRS. Both hooks approved. Mifter Public (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)