Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Edna Loftus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>78.26 m (strike two!) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from June 2018]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Edna Loftus==== | ====Edna Loftus==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
{{main page image|image=Edna Loftus in The Catch of the Season.jpg|caption=Edna Loftus in 1906.|width=120x133}} | {{main page image|image=Edna Loftus in The Catch of the Season.jpg|caption=Edna Loftus in 1906.|width=120x133}} | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that actress '''[[Edna Loftus]]''' ''(pictured)'' freed her fiancée from an [[History of psychiatric institutions|asylum]] after his mother had him committed? | * ... that actress '''[[Edna Loftus]]''' ''(pictured)'' freed her fiancée from an [[History of psychiatric institutions|asylum]] after his mother had him committed? | ||
** <s>'''ALT1''':... that '''[[Edna Loftus]]''' ''(pictured)'' gave up acting to pluck chickens with her husband?</s> | ** <s>'''ALT1''':... that '''[[Edna Loftus]]''' ''(pictured)'' gave up acting to pluck chickens with her husband?</s> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 14: | ||
:* ''Comment'': Source [https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SFC19100209.2.103.15&srpos=1&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN-%22edna+loftus%22+corpus-------1] | :* ''Comment'': Source [https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=SFC19100209.2.103.15&srpos=1&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN-%22edna+loftus%22+corpus-------1] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Froggerlaura|Froggerlaura]] ([[User talk:Froggerlaura|talk]]). Self-nominated at 07:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Froggerlaura|Froggerlaura]] ([[User talk:Froggerlaura|talk]]). Self-nominated at 07:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, article created day of nomination. More than 6 times long enough. Article written in neutral manner (nice feat, considering the sensationalist reporting of the time) and each section contains numerous inline citations. No copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvios found, and the article text is markedly different than the public domain sources. Both hooks are interesting, but I find the original more so. The first hook is directly supported by the inline citation within the article. The second hook is not, because the proposed hook says she plucked chickens "with" her husband, while the source says she plucked chickens "for" her husband, an important enough distinction I think it ought not be placed on the main page. Therefore I approved '''ALT0'''. QPQ complete. Image is in public domain, so no copyright issues there. It also displays well at small size. [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h; color: #008B8B;"><b>78.26</b></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 17:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, article created day of nomination. More than 6 times long enough. Article written in neutral manner (nice feat, considering the sensationalist reporting of the time) and each section contains numerous inline citations. No copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvios found, and the article text is markedly different than the public domain sources. Both hooks are interesting, but I find the original more so. The first hook is directly supported by the inline citation within the article. The second hook is not, because the proposed hook says she plucked chickens "with" her husband, while the source says she plucked chickens "for" her husband, an important enough distinction I think it ought not be placed on the main page. Therefore I approved '''ALT0'''. QPQ complete. Image is in public domain, so no copyright issues there. It also displays well at small size. [[User:78.26|<span style="border:1px solid black;color:red; padding:1px;background:1h5h1h; color: #008B8B;"><b>78.26</b></span>]] <sub>([[User talk:78.26|spin me]] / [[Special:Contributions/78.26|revolutions]])</sub> 17:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}} | + | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 06:25, 18 June 2018
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Edna Loftus
- ... that actress Edna Loftus (pictured) freed her fiancée from an asylum after his mother had him committed?
ALT1:... that Edna Loftus (pictured) gave up acting to pluck chickens with her husband?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Wolfgang Straßmann
- Comment: Source [1]
Created by Froggerlaura (talk). Self-nominated at 07:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC).
New enough, article created day of nomination. More than 6 times long enough. Article written in neutral manner (nice feat, considering the sensationalist reporting of the time) and each section contains numerous inline citations. No copying, close paraphrasing, or other copyvios found, and the article text is markedly different than the public domain sources. Both hooks are interesting, but I find the original more so. The first hook is directly supported by the inline citation within the article. The second hook is not, because the proposed hook says she plucked chickens "with" her husband, while the source says she plucked chickens "for" her husband, an important enough distinction I think it ought not be placed on the main page. Therefore I approved ALT0. QPQ complete. Image is in public domain, so no copyright issues there. It also displays well at small size. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
