Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Edna S. Purcell House"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sionk
(Image removed)
imported>Cbl62
(With the photo now removed from the hook, this is good to go.)
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
::*Point taken. The colour photo is certainly not pre-1923! I've removed it from the nomination. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 21:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 
::*Point taken. The colour photo is certainly not pre-1923! I've removed it from the nomination. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 21:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 +
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] With the photo now removed from the hook, this is good to go. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 21:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:45, 20 August 2013

Edna S. Purcell House

  • ... that the innovative Edna S. Purcell House, built in 1913, has a rare example of an original kitchen and bathroom, nearly untouched since the house was built?

Created/expanded by MJBredeson (talk). Nominated by Sionk (talk) at 02:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article's recent 5X expansion has been confirmed. Hook is short and interesting enough. Sourcing is to an off-line work published by the University of Minnesota Press. Assumption of good faith with respect to accuracy of sourcing. Spot-checking (and running of copyvio check) show no signs of non-compliance with core policies. QPQ is complete. However, I have a concern about the image license. The license asserts that the image is public domain but the description indicates that the photograph is from the Minnesota Institute of Arts. The image is found on the MIA's facebook page here. Moreover, the MIA's page here on this house states: "All Rights Reserved. Minneapolis Institute of Arts." Bottom line is that the PD license appears dubious and unsubstantiated. This hook is fine to run without image. If nominator wants it to run with image, further information on licensing is needed. Cbl62 (talk) 00:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Point taken. The colour photo is certainly not pre-1923! I've removed it from the nomination. Sionk (talk) 21:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg With the photo now removed from the hook, this is good to go. Cbl62 (talk) 21:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC)