Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Edna S. Purcell House"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cbl62 (With the photo now removed from the hook, this is good to go.) |
imported>Alex Shih (promote to prep 4) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from August 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Alex Shih|Alex Shih]][[User_talk:Alex Shih|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 23:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)<br />}} |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====Edna S. Purcell House==== | ====Edna S. Purcell House==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Edna S. Purcell House|Edna S. Purcell House}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Edna S. Purcell House|Edna S. Purcell House}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{*mp}}... that the innovative '''[[Edna S. Purcell House]]''', built in 1913, has a rare example of an original kitchen and bathroom, nearly untouched since the house was built? | {{*mp}}... that the innovative '''[[Edna S. Purcell House]]''', built in 1913, has a rare example of an original kitchen and bathroom, nearly untouched since the house was built? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
::{{*mp}} ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Brooke Pancake|Brooke Pancake]] | ::{{*mp}} ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Brooke Pancake|Brooke Pancake]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:MJBredeson|MJBredeson]] ([[User talk:MJBredeson|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) at 02:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:MJBredeson|MJBredeson]] ([[User talk:MJBredeson|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) at 02:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article's recent 5X expansion has been confirmed. Hook is short and interesting enough. Sourcing is to an off-line work published by the University of Minnesota Press. Assumption of good faith with respect to accuracy of sourcing. Spot-checking (and running of copyvio check) show no signs of non-compliance with core policies. QPQ is complete. However, I have a concern about the image license. The license asserts that the image is public domain but the description indicates that the photograph is from the Minnesota Institute of Arts. The image is found on the MIA's facebook page [http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://sphotos-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/p480x480/1098452_10151768359748069_1761829528_n.jpg&imgrefurl=https://www.facebook.com/artsmia&h=377&w=600&sz=42&tbnid=syLdNXuwwQnVrM:&tbnh=68&tbnw=108&zoom=1&usg=__lzS5bu7-ntBmwGH2WQhwTw6uGn0=&docid=I4cuZ7zwxg92HM&sa=X&ei=PLsSUo-6A-nGiwLN4YDoAg&ved=0CD4Q9QEwAw&dur=2222 here]. Moreover, the MIA's page [https://collections.artsmia.org/index.php?page=purcell-cutts# here] on this house states: "All Rights Reserved. Minneapolis Institute of Arts." Bottom line is that the PD license appears dubious and unsubstantiated. This hook is fine to run without image. If nominator wants it to run with image, further information on licensing is needed. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 00:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article's recent 5X expansion has been confirmed. Hook is short and interesting enough. Sourcing is to an off-line work published by the University of Minnesota Press. Assumption of good faith with respect to accuracy of sourcing. Spot-checking (and running of copyvio check) show no signs of non-compliance with core policies. QPQ is complete. However, I have a concern about the image license. The license asserts that the image is public domain but the description indicates that the photograph is from the Minnesota Institute of Arts. The image is found on the MIA's facebook page [http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://sphotos-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/p480x480/1098452_10151768359748069_1761829528_n.jpg&imgrefurl=https://www.facebook.com/artsmia&h=377&w=600&sz=42&tbnid=syLdNXuwwQnVrM:&tbnh=68&tbnw=108&zoom=1&usg=__lzS5bu7-ntBmwGH2WQhwTw6uGn0=&docid=I4cuZ7zwxg92HM&sa=X&ei=PLsSUo-6A-nGiwLN4YDoAg&ved=0CD4Q9QEwAw&dur=2222 here]. Moreover, the MIA's page [https://collections.artsmia.org/index.php?page=purcell-cutts# here] on this house states: "All Rights Reserved. Minneapolis Institute of Arts." Bottom line is that the PD license appears dubious and unsubstantiated. This hook is fine to run without image. If nominator wants it to run with image, further information on licensing is needed. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 00:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
::*Point taken. The colour photo is certainly not pre-1923! I've removed it from the nomination. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 21:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC) | ::*Point taken. The colour photo is certainly not pre-1923! I've removed it from the nomination. [[User:Sionk|Sionk]] ([[User talk:Sionk|talk]]) 21:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] With the photo now removed from the hook, this is good to go. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 21:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC) | + | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] With the photo now removed from the hook, this is good to go. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 21:45, 20 August 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:49, 20 August 2013
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Alex ShihTalk 23:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Edna S. Purcell House
- ... that the innovative Edna S. Purcell House, built in 1913, has a rare example of an original kitchen and bathroom, nearly untouched since the house was built?
- Reviewed: Brooke Pancake
Created/expanded by MJBredeson (talk). Nominated by Sionk (talk) at 02:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC).
Article's recent 5X expansion has been confirmed. Hook is short and interesting enough. Sourcing is to an off-line work published by the University of Minnesota Press. Assumption of good faith with respect to accuracy of sourcing. Spot-checking (and running of copyvio check) show no signs of non-compliance with core policies. QPQ is complete. However, I have a concern about the image license. The license asserts that the image is public domain but the description indicates that the photograph is from the Minnesota Institute of Arts. The image is found on the MIA's facebook page here. Moreover, the MIA's page here on this house states: "All Rights Reserved. Minneapolis Institute of Arts." Bottom line is that the PD license appears dubious and unsubstantiated. This hook is fine to run without image. If nominator wants it to run with image, further information on licensing is needed. Cbl62 (talk) 00:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)