Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 1)
imported>Yoninah
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subst:DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from September 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=September 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=yes
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi}}
 
{{DYK header|Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi|Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi|Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that property developer '''[[Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi]]''' is engaged to marry [[Princess Beatrice of York]], whom he has known since childhood?  <small>Source: "He first met Beatrice as a child..." [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/life/meet-edoardo-mapelli-mozzi-dashing-developer-has-charmed-princess/]</small>
 
* ... that property developer '''[[Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi]]''' is engaged to marry [[Princess Beatrice of York]], whom he has known since childhood?  <small>Source: "He first met Beatrice as a child..." [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/life/meet-edoardo-mapelli-mozzi-dashing-developer-has-charmed-princess/]</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure|Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure|Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Rimagi|Rimagi]] ([[User talk:Rimagi|talk]]), [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]), and [[User:Minerva97|Minerva97]] ([[User talk:Minerva97|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) at 14:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Rimagi|Rimagi]] ([[User talk:Rimagi|talk]]), [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]), and [[User:Minerva97|Minerva97]] ([[User talk:Minerva97|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) at 14:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi|Rimagi|subpage=Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi|Edwardx}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi|Minerva97}}
 
* {{DYKnom|Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi|Surtsicna}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough. It is neutrally written, and is appropriately sourced. The hook is interesting; AGF on paywalled source. No image is used. One of the sentences was far too close to the source; I have paraphrased; please take more care in the future. QPQ is complete. Good to go. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User Talk:Vanamonde93|Talk]])</span> 20:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough. It is neutrally written, and is appropriately sourced. The hook is interesting; AGF on paywalled source. No image is used. One of the sentences was far too close to the source; I have paraphrased; please take more care in the future. QPQ is complete. Good to go. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User Talk:Vanamonde93|Talk]])</span> 20:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Line 25: Line 14:
 
::::He might then be even more notable; it's been a while since the last time a British princess was jilted. But in all seriousness, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]], he does seem to be independently notable. For example, [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/02/realestate/london-luxury-property-undervalued-neighborhoods.html this NYT profile of Mapelli Mozzi] is entirely about his real estate career, and mentions his connection to the British royal family only in passing. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 11:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 
::::He might then be even more notable; it's been a while since the last time a British princess was jilted. But in all seriousness, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]], he does seem to be independently notable. For example, [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/02/realestate/london-luxury-property-undervalued-neighborhoods.html this NYT profile of Mapelli Mozzi] is entirely about his real estate career, and mentions his connection to the British royal family only in passing. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 11:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 
::::What matters is whether or not there has been significant coverage in reliable sources, per [[WP:GNG]], and he clearly passes that bar. If the article would survive AfD, then there is no policy-based reason not to have it as a DYK. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 12:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
 
::::What matters is whether or not there has been significant coverage in reliable sources, per [[WP:GNG]], and he clearly passes that bar. If the article would survive AfD, then there is no policy-based reason not to have it as a DYK. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 12:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
:::::*{{subst:DYKtickAGF} I hear. Restoring tick per Vanadmonde's review (offline source for me). [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
+
:::::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] I hear. Restoring tick per Vanadmonde's review (offline source for me). [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 19:18, 9 October 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Edoardo Mapelli Mozzi

Created by Rimagi (talk), Edwardx (talk), and Minerva97 (talk). Nominated by Surtsicna (talk) at 14:06, 28 September 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Article is new enough and long enough. It is neutrally written, and is appropriately sourced. The hook is interesting; AGF on paywalled source. No image is used. One of the sentences was far too close to the source; I have paraphrased; please take more care in the future. QPQ is complete. Good to go. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but I was wondering why this subject is notable. His only claim to fame seems to being the princess's fiance. If they break up, is he still notable? Yoninah (talk) 00:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
He might then be even more notable; it's been a while since the last time a British princess was jilted. But in all seriousness, Yoninah, he does seem to be independently notable. For example, this NYT profile of Mapelli Mozzi is entirely about his real estate career, and mentions his connection to the British royal family only in passing. Surtsicna (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
What matters is whether or not there has been significant coverage in reliable sources, per WP:GNG, and he clearly passes that bar. If the article would survive AfD, then there is no policy-based reason not to have it as a DYK. Edwardx (talk) 12:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol voting keep.svg I hear. Restoring tick per Vanadmonde's review (offline source for me). Yoninah (talk) 19:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)