Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/El Protector (2016)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>ImmortalWizard |
imported>Wugapodes (reviewing) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::Well in most sports there are people who finally score "50 goals" or "200 runs" or whatever the case may be. Alt1 clarifies that he's the first to do this, so it's not that he won in general but that he's the first to do so after being unsuccessful in two previous tournaments.[[User:MPJ-DK|'''<span style="background:blue;color:white;border: 1px solid blue"> MPJ</span>''']][[User talk:MPJ-DK|<span style="background:red;color:white;border: 1px solid blue">'''-US''' </span>]] 21:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC) | ::Well in most sports there are people who finally score "50 goals" or "200 runs" or whatever the case may be. Alt1 clarifies that he's the first to do this, so it's not that he won in general but that he's the first to do so after being unsuccessful in two previous tournaments.[[User:MPJ-DK|'''<span style="background:blue;color:white;border: 1px solid blue"> MPJ</span>''']][[User talk:MPJ-DK|<span style="background:red;color:white;border: 1px solid blue">'''-US''' </span>]] 21:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::Alt1 looks much better, being the 'only' one. [[User:Ikhtiar H|Ikhtiar H]] ([[User talk:Ikhtiar H|talk]]) 11:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC) | :::Alt1 looks much better, being the 'only' one. [[User:Ikhtiar H|Ikhtiar H]] ([[User talk:Ikhtiar H|talk]]) 11:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ;Review | ||
| + | *'''Article''' | ||
| + | :#Old enough at time of nomination | ||
| + | :#Long enough at 3100 characters | ||
| + | :#[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]Background only has one inline citation and there are no general citations so it's unclear whether some of the information is [[WP:OR]] or not. (I don't read Spanish, so I'm assuming good faith on the sourcing) | ||
| + | *'''Hook''' | ||
| + | :#Both are short enough | ||
| + | :#I think ALT1 is more interesting, and that Ikhtiar H brings up a good point above as to why the original hook isn't that interesting or accesible | ||
| + | *'''Other''' | ||
| + | :#QPQ done | ||
| + | :#No image | ||
| + | *'''Result''' [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] I would like to see the background section be better sourced, even if it's just a general citation, before recommending the article be featured. | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 02:39, 19 February 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
El Protector (2016)
- ... Mexican professional wrestler Atomic Star finally won the El Protector tournament after being unsuccessful in the 2014 and 2015 tournaments??
- Alt1 - ...professional wrestler Atomic Star became the only rookie to compete in three El Protector tournaments when he won the 2016 El Protector?
Created by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 02:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC).
- it is a "rookie tournament", few people compete in that tournament more than twice. MPJ-US 13:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Well in most sports there are people who finally score "50 goals" or "200 runs" or whatever the case may be. Alt1 clarifies that he's the first to do this, so it's not that he won in general but that he's the first to do so after being unsuccessful in two previous tournaments. MPJ-US 21:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Review
- Article
- Old enough at time of nomination
- Long enough at 3100 characters
- File:Symbol possible vote.svgBackground only has one inline citation and there are no general citations so it's unclear whether some of the information is WP:OR or not. (I don't read Spanish, so I'm assuming good faith on the sourcing)
- Hook
- Both are short enough
- I think ALT1 is more interesting, and that Ikhtiar H brings up a good point above as to why the original hook isn't that interesting or accesible
- Other
- QPQ done
- No image
- Result File:Symbol possible vote.svg I would like to see the background section be better sourced, even if it's just a general citation, before recommending the article be featured.