Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Dilling"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Signedzzz
imported>Signedzzz
Line 24: Line 24:
 
::*[[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] the Einstein part is in the 3rd paragraph of the Anti-communism section, and the Hitler part is in the 2nd footnote. Both referenced. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 20:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 
::*[[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] the Einstein part is in the 3rd paragraph of the Anti-communism section, and the Hitler part is in the 2nd footnote. Both referenced. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 20:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 
:::*I can accept the Einstein part but the Hitler part is only in a footnote, so I am not sure if that is within policy for hook if there not in the main content. Third opinion? [[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] ([[User talk:KAVEBEAR|talk]]) 20:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 
:::*I can accept the Einstein part but the Hitler part is only in a footnote, so I am not sure if that is within policy for hook if there not in the main content. Third opinion? [[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] ([[User talk:KAVEBEAR|talk]]) 20:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
::::*The footnote in question is definitely "part of the main content". My decision to make it a footnote does not reflect on its importance. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 20:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
+
::::*The footnote in question is definitely "part of the main content". My decision to make it a footnote does not reflect on its importance in any way, it was just the easiest way to organize it at the time. [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 20:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 
   
 
   
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:47, 5 July 2016

Elizabeth Dilling

Elizabeth Dilling
Elizabeth Dilling

Improved to Good Article status by Signedzzz (talk). Self-nominated at 22:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Recently promoted to GA status. No close paraphrasing or neutrality issues detected. However, the hook is not in the article at all. I see bits and pieces of it from the article itself mainly in the note section but no direct reference to it or a direct source for the hook. KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  • KAVEBEAR the Einstein part is in the 3rd paragraph of the Anti-communism section, and the Hitler part is in the 2nd footnote. Both referenced. zzz (talk) 20:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  • I can accept the Einstein part but the Hitler part is only in a footnote, so I am not sure if that is within policy for hook if there not in the main content. Third opinion? KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
  • The footnote in question is definitely "part of the main content". My decision to make it a footnote does not reflect on its importance in any way, it was just the easiest way to organize it at the time. zzz (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)