Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Elizabeth Lachlan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Worm That Turned (hatting) |
imported>Casliber (promoted) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from August 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
− | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 10:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Elizabeth Lachlan==== | ====Elizabeth Lachlan==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Elizabeth Lachlan|Elizabeth Lachlan}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Elizabeth Lachlan|Elizabeth Lachlan}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that educationist '''[[Elizabeth Lachlan]]''' was asked to be governess for [[Queen Victoria]] as a child? | * ... that educationist '''[[Elizabeth Lachlan]]''' was asked to be governess for [[Queen Victoria]] as a child? | ||
Line 17: | Line 12: | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Phase II]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Phase II]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Worm That Turned|Worm That Turned]] ([[User talk:Worm That Turned|talk]]) and [[User:Staceydolxx|Staceydolxx]] ([[User talk:Staceydolxx|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Worm That Turned|Worm That Turned]] ([[User talk:Worm That Turned|talk]]) at 16:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Worm That Turned|Worm That Turned]] ([[User talk:Worm That Turned|talk]]) and [[User:Staceydolxx|Staceydolxx]] ([[User talk:Staceydolxx|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Worm That Turned|Worm That Turned]] ([[User talk:Worm That Turned|talk]]) at 16:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Fresh and long enough! QPQ done and not too closely paraphrased. Unfortunately, there appear to be no photographs of Lachlan available online. Having taken a look at the ODNB's article about her, I can tell there is room for improvement, i.e. expansion, but nothing to prevent this article from appearing on the main page. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 20:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Fresh and long enough! QPQ done and not too closely paraphrased. Unfortunately, there appear to be no photographs of Lachlan available online. Having taken a look at the ODNB's article about her, I can tell there is room for improvement, i.e. expansion, but nothing to prevent this article from appearing on the main page. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 20:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
Line 38: | Line 29: | ||
::::::::All of my required 50% QPQ re-reviews contain boilerplate text to the effect of "this nom requires two reviews". It is an '''absolute requirement''' I announce that all nominations reviewed by me require two reviews, no exception has been granted (of which I'm aware) in the case where one of the two reviews was already completed before my review. As my restrictions were imposed on me for an alleged failure to follow procedures precisely, you'll appreciate if I am unwilling to rely on casual or "common sense" interpretations - that's what got me into this mess. Assurance that I exhibit perfect interpretation of policies is the only possibility of future relief I have from the current restrictions. And no, this is not me being [[WP:POINT]]y, this is a reasonable precaution that anyone in my situation would take. | ::::::::All of my required 50% QPQ re-reviews contain boilerplate text to the effect of "this nom requires two reviews". It is an '''absolute requirement''' I announce that all nominations reviewed by me require two reviews, no exception has been granted (of which I'm aware) in the case where one of the two reviews was already completed before my review. As my restrictions were imposed on me for an alleged failure to follow procedures precisely, you'll appreciate if I am unwilling to rely on casual or "common sense" interpretations - that's what got me into this mess. Assurance that I exhibit perfect interpretation of policies is the only possibility of future relief I have from the current restrictions. And no, this is not me being [[WP:POINT]]y, this is a reasonable precaution that anyone in my situation would take. | ||
:::::::: My reviews have been reviewed by the sanctioning admin who lauded me for correct implementation and, while no one has expressed confusion up to this point, if you feel it is confusing and that people are likely to construe the boilerplate means "two reviews following the last review" instead of "two reviews total", I would be happy to modify this language as per your direction. I would just ask you place the modification language on my Talk page or something as there have been so many overlapping corollaries and amendments added to these restrictions in various locations across the Wikisphere that it is getting difficult to track them all, which is undoubtedly part of the issue. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 10:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | :::::::: My reviews have been reviewed by the sanctioning admin who lauded me for correct implementation and, while no one has expressed confusion up to this point, if you feel it is confusing and that people are likely to construe the boilerplate means "two reviews following the last review" instead of "two reviews total", I would be happy to modify this language as per your direction. I would just ask you place the modification language on my Talk page or something as there have been so many overlapping corollaries and amendments added to these restrictions in various locations across the Wikisphere that it is getting difficult to track them all, which is undoubtedly part of the issue. [[User:LavaBaron|LavaBaron]] ([[User talk:LavaBaron|talk]]) 10:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | {{hab}} | + | {{hab}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− |
Latest revision as of 10:57, 9 August 2016
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Elizabeth Lachlan
- ... that educationist Elizabeth Lachlan was asked to be governess for Queen Victoria as a child?
- ALT1 ... that educationist Elizabeth Lachlan was asked to be Queen Victoria's governess?
Created by Worm That Turned (talk) and Staceydolxx (talk). Nominated by Worm That Turned (talk) at 16:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC).
Fresh and long enough! QPQ done and not too closely paraphrased. Unfortunately, there appear to be no photographs of Lachlan available online. Having taken a look at the ODNB's article about her, I can tell there is room for improvement, i.e. expansion, but nothing to prevent this article from appearing on the main page. Surtsicna (talk) 20:16, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Off topic discussion re LavaBaron restrictions |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|