Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Engagement Ring (Roy Lichtenstein)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>TonyTheTiger |
imported>Secretlondon (comments) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:*1st of 2 QPQs against [[Template:Did you know nominations/Stafanie Taylor]]--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 03:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | :*1st of 2 QPQs against [[Template:Did you know nominations/Stafanie Taylor]]--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 03:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | + | :[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Length and newness is fine. It is classed as a stub. I don't think you get 2 self noms for [[Template:Did you know nominations/Stafanie Taylor]] unless I'm not understanding the QPQ rule. I can't find the hook in the article! The nearest I can find is: "The general "rawness" of the work links it to Lichtenstein's work from the 1950s, while its "integrated formality" links it to his subsequent works." I accept I'm no art historian however.. [[User:Secretlondon|Secretlondon]] ([[User talk:Secretlondon|talk]]) 00:59, 27 May 2012 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 00:59, 27 May 2012
Engagement Ring (Roy Lichtenstein)
- ... that Roy Lichtenstein's Engagement Ring marks his transition from his prior painterly work to his subsequent more polished mechanical-looking work?
Created/expanded by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 20:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- 1st of 2 QPQs against Template:Did you know nominations/Stafanie Taylor--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:13, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Length and newness is fine. It is classed as a stub. I don't think you get 2 self noms for Template:Did you know nominations/Stafanie Taylor unless I'm not understanding the QPQ rule. I can't find the hook in the article! The nearest I can find is: "The general "rawness" of the work links it to Lichtenstein's work from the 1950s, while its "integrated formality" links it to his subsequent works." I accept I'm no art historian however.. Secretlondon (talk) 00:59, 27 May 2012 (UTC)