Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Eoprephasma"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Spirit of Eagle |
imported>Spirit of Eagle |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Ok, let’s see: the article was created less than a week ago, has sufficient characters and it’s within policy (I’m assuming in good faith that the article is free of close paraphrasing). The hook is less than 200 characters, interesting, neutral, and is cited in-line. All in all, this hook is good to go. Also, I’d go with the first hook since it’s more interesting. [[User:Spirit of Eagle|Spirit of Eagle]] ([[User talk:Spirit of Eagle|talk]]) 04:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 04:35, 20 March 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Eoprephasma
- ... that the fossil stick insect Eoprephasma was described from two isolated forewings?
- ALT1:... that the extinct stick insect Eoprephasma is known from Washington and British Columbian fossils?
- Reviewed: Brachycaudus helichrysi
- Comment: Reviewed Brachycaudus helichrysi of the nomination
Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nominated at 04:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC).
Ok, let’s see: the article was created less than a week ago, has sufficient characters and it’s within policy (I’m assuming in good faith that the article is free of close paraphrasing). The hook is less than 200 characters, interesting, neutral, and is cited in-line. All in all, this hook is good to go. Also, I’d go with the first hook since it’s more interesting. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:35, 20 March 2015 (UTC)