Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Epsom General Hospital"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (reviewer needed) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (QPQ review needed) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Normal full DYK review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Normal full DYK review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] As far as I can see, the nominator has more than 5 DYKs and needs to do a QPQ review. Otherwise this article meets DYK criteria. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 11:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 11:31, 25 November 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Epsom General Hospital
- ... that Epsom General Hospital (pictured) has its own radio station, "Epsom Hospital Radio", which is a registered charity and is staffed by volunteers?
- Comment: Epsom Hospital Radio did exist but I redirected it per WP:TNT; the content there was pure trite.
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk), Ritchie333 (talk). Nominated by Launchballer (talk) at 23:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC).
Per the list provided by User:Allen3 here, I stopped by to check for compliance with Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines for medical text. This article is about an institution, and I don't see anything in the proposed hooks that engages MEDRS, nor did I see anything problematic wrt MEDRS only in the article; I will leave source verification, copyvio checking, etc to other DYK reviewers, and mention that a copyedit is needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Normal full DYK review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
As far as I can see, the nominator has more than 5 DYKs and needs to do a QPQ review. Otherwise this article meets DYK criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)