Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Epstein didn't kill himself"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Epicgenius
(approve)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 1)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Epstein didn't kill himself}}
 
{{DYK header|Epstein didn't kill himself}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Epstein didn't kill himself|Epstein didn't kill himself}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Epstein didn't kill himself|Epstein didn't kill himself}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that [[Christmas jumper]]s featuring the phrase "'''[[Epstein didn't kill himself]]'''" are available for sale? <small>Source: [[Special:Permalink/928083229#cite_note-Slate-18]]</small>
 
* ... that [[Christmas jumper]]s featuring the phrase "'''[[Epstein didn't kill himself]]'''" are available for sale? <small>Source: [[Special:Permalink/928083229#cite_note-Slate-18]]</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/bongos eat burnt wood]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/bongos eat burnt wood]]
 
:* ''Comment'': I believe it contains enough text that the Background section (which ''is'' from [[Death of Jeffrey Epstein]]) can be disregarded and the article still considered new enough.
 
:* ''Comment'': I believe it contains enough text that the Background section (which ''is'' from [[Death of Jeffrey Epstein]]) can be disregarded and the article still considered new enough.
 
<small>Created by [[User:MJL|MJL]] ([[User talk:MJL|talk]]). Self-nominated at 18:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:MJL|MJL]] ([[User talk:MJL|talk]]). Self-nominated at 18:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Epstein didn't kill himself|MJL|subpage=Epstein didn't kill himself}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* {{re|MJL}} Hi, I'll review this. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 05:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 
:* {{re|MJL}} Hi, I'll review this. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 05:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Line 57: Line 49:
  
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] As there has been a major expansion since the first approval, including entirely new sections, I think it's important that a re-review is done now that there was no consensus for the proposed merge, since the new material should be vetted for all the usual things (neutrality, sourcing, copyvio, etc.). [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]], did you want to do that, or should we find a new reviewer? My assumption is that [[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]]'s approval of your ALT1 would still stand if the rest of the article still passes, though she may wish to reconfirm. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 20:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] As there has been a major expansion since the first approval, including entirely new sections, I think it's important that a re-review is done now that there was no consensus for the proposed merge, since the new material should be vetted for all the usual things (neutrality, sourcing, copyvio, etc.). [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]], did you want to do that, or should we find a new reviewer? My assumption is that [[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]]'s approval of your ALT1 would still stand if the rest of the article still passes, though she may wish to reconfirm. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 20:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK, I will review this again. It is still new enough as the 7,500 bytes of this article is a five-fold expansion of the copied text. Sourcing is adequate, and there are no non-neutral parts of the article. Most of the copyvio pickups seem to be quotes. The hook is still OK. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 20:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
+
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK, I will review this again. It is still new enough as the 7,500 bytes of this article is a five-fold expansion of the copied text. Sourcing is adequate, and there are no non-neutral parts of the article. Most of the copyvio pickups seem to be quotes. The hook is still OK. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 20:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 21:01, 7 January 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Epstein didn't kill himself

Created by MJL (talk). Self-nominated at 18:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC).

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

  • Template:Re Oh my gosh.. I absolutely love ALT1!!! That would be the the perfect hook to for the quirky one at the end of a set. I guess that's why you're named epicgenuis. –MJLTalk 05:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Nice. Symbol confirmed.svg ALT1 is good to go, I personally find this the most interesting as well. Thanks for the quick response.
  • However, the {{merge}} tag still needs to be removed before promotion. I see slightly more opposes than supports at that page, but still. epicgenius (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:Re As it happens, you are not allowed to approve a hook you wrote yourself. (I learned that the hard way once.) This would probably have gotten bounced by the higher-ups in the process. So I will approve it:
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go with ALT1. -- MelanieN (talk) 04:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:U, thanks. I just recently learned that I can't approve my own hooks as well, though not in as drastic a manner as you likely did. epicgenius (talk) 15:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:Re Just the background section (which was partly re-written and added to). Everything else in the article is new content. I can giv you a full character count when I get home (as well apply {{Copied}}). Regards, –MJLTalk 18:19, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:Re Character count of the prose in the entire article is 7,300 bytes. Conservatively (including ref brackets and other markup), copied prose is about 1,280 bytes. So this does represent a 5x expansion. epicgenius (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg As there has been a major expansion since the first approval, including entirely new sections, I think it's important that a re-review is done now that there was no consensus for the proposed merge, since the new material should be vetted for all the usual things (neutrality, sourcing, copyvio, etc.). epicgenius, did you want to do that, or should we find a new reviewer? My assumption is that MelanieN's approval of your ALT1 would still stand if the rest of the article still passes, though she may wish to reconfirm. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg OK, I will review this again. It is still new enough as the 7,500 bytes of this article is a five-fold expansion of the copied text. Sourcing is adequate, and there are no non-neutral parts of the article. Most of the copyvio pickups seem to be quotes. The hook is still OK. epicgenius (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2020 (UTC)