Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Equus (film)"
imported>Yoninah (grammar) |
imported>Ribbet32 (reply) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that a few critics felt a more realistic portrayal of violence and horses in the 1977 film '''''[[Equus (film)|Equus]]''''' lost some of the spirit— and even the | + | * ... that a few critics felt a more realistic portrayal of violence and horses in the 1977 film '''''[[Equus (film)|Equus]]''''' lost some of the spirit— and even the realism— of [[Equus (play)|the play]]? |
<small>Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' [[Roger Ebert]], "[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/equus-1977 Equus]," ''Rogerebert.com'', 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; Welsh also felt the explicit blinding was "potentially repulsive," and "much of the spirit of the play is lost as a consequence." Thomas L. Erskine and James M. Welsh, Video Versions: Film Adaptations of Plays on Video, Greenwood Press, 2000, p. 112.</small> | <small>Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' [[Roger Ebert]], "[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/equus-1977 Equus]," ''Rogerebert.com'', 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; Welsh also felt the explicit blinding was "potentially repulsive," and "much of the spirit of the play is lost as a consequence." Thomas L. Erskine and James M. Welsh, Video Versions: Film Adaptations of Plays on Video, Greenwood Press, 2000, p. 112.</small> | ||
| − | ** '''ALT1''':... that the 1977 film '''''[[Equus (film)|Equus]]''''' featured real horses rather than the masked men seen in the [[Equus (play)|original play]], but [[Roger Ebert]] said this was less | + | ** '''ALT1''':... that the 1977 film '''''[[Equus (film)|Equus]]''''' featured real horses rather than the masked men seen in the [[Equus (play)|original play]], but [[Roger Ebert]] said this was less realistic? |
<small>Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' [[Roger Ebert]], "[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/equus-1977 Equus]," ''Rogerebert.com'', 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; In stage productions, the horses are portrayed by human actors, often muscular men wearing tribal-style masks. Richard Harland Smith , "[http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/17106/Equus/articles.html Equus (1977)]," ''[[Turner Classic Movies]]'', URL accessed 24 October 2016.</small> | <small>Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' [[Roger Ebert]], "[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/equus-1977 Equus]," ''Rogerebert.com'', 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; In stage productions, the horses are portrayed by human actors, often muscular men wearing tribal-style masks. Richard Harland Smith , "[http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/17106/Equus/articles.html Equus (1977)]," ''[[Turner Classic Movies]]'', URL accessed 24 October 2016.</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area|Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area|Guapi-Guapiaçu Environmental Protection Area]] | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:* In ALT0, it should be "the realism", not "the reality". In ALT1, it should be "less realistic", not "less real". [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC) | :* In ALT0, it should be "the realism", not "the reality". In ALT1, it should be "less realistic", not "less real". [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:23, 30 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ::* Fine with those adjustments. [[User:Ribbet32|Ribbet32]] ([[User talk:Ribbet32|talk]]) 19:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 30 October 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Equus (film)
- ... that a few critics felt a more realistic portrayal of violence and horses in the 1977 film Equus lost some of the spirit— and even the realism— of the play?
Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' Roger Ebert, "Equus," Rogerebert.com, 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; Welsh also felt the explicit blinding was "potentially repulsive," and "much of the spirit of the play is lost as a consequence." Thomas L. Erskine and James M. Welsh, Video Versions: Film Adaptations of Plays on Video, Greenwood Press, 2000, p. 112.
- ALT1:... that the 1977 film Equus featured real horses rather than the masked men seen in the original play, but Roger Ebert said this was less realistic?
Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' Roger Ebert, "Equus," Rogerebert.com, 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; In stage productions, the horses are portrayed by human actors, often muscular men wearing tribal-style masks. Richard Harland Smith , "Equus (1977)," Turner Classic Movies, URL accessed 24 October 2016.
5x expanded by Ribbet32 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC).