Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Equus (film)"
imported>DYKReviewBot m (Automatically reviewing nomination: There may be issues which need to be addressed (Problems? Report it.)) |
imported>EEng (fmt) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that a few critics felt a more realistic portrayal of violence and horses in the 1977 film '''''[[Equus (film)|Equus]]''''' lost some of the | + | * ... that a few critics felt a more realistic portrayal of violence and horses in the 1977 film '''''[[Equus (film)|Equus]]''''' lost some of the spirit{{mdashb}}and even the realism{{mdashb}}of [[Equus (play)|the play]]? |
<small>Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' [[Roger Ebert]], "[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/equus-1977 Equus]," ''Rogerebert.com'', 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; Welsh also felt the explicit blinding was "potentially repulsive," and "much of the spirit of the play is lost as a consequence." Thomas L. Erskine and James M. Welsh, Video Versions: Film Adaptations of Plays on Video, Greenwood Press, 2000, p. 112.</small> | <small>Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' [[Roger Ebert]], "[http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/equus-1977 Equus]," ''Rogerebert.com'', 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; Welsh also felt the explicit blinding was "potentially repulsive," and "much of the spirit of the play is lost as a consequence." Thomas L. Erskine and James M. Welsh, Video Versions: Film Adaptations of Plays on Video, Greenwood Press, 2000, p. 112.</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that the 1977 film '''''[[Equus (film)|Equus]]''''' featured real horses rather than the masked men seen in the [[Equus (play)|original play]], but [[Roger Ebert]] said this was less realistic? | ** '''ALT1''':... that the 1977 film '''''[[Equus (film)|Equus]]''''' featured real horses rather than the masked men seen in the [[Equus (play)|original play]], but [[Roger Ebert]] said this was less realistic? | ||
Revision as of 07:30, 2 November 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Equus (film)
- ... that a few critics felt a more realistic portrayal of violence and horses in the 1977 film Equus lost some of the spirit
- REDIRECT Template:Zero width joiner em dash zero width non joinerand even the realism
- REDIRECT Template:Zero width joiner em dash zero width non joinerof the play?
Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' Roger Ebert, "Equus," Rogerebert.com, 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; Welsh also felt the explicit blinding was "potentially repulsive," and "much of the spirit of the play is lost as a consequence." Thomas L. Erskine and James M. Welsh, Video Versions: Film Adaptations of Plays on Video, Greenwood Press, 2000, p. 112.
- ALT1:... that the 1977 film Equus featured real horses rather than the masked men seen in the original play, but Roger Ebert said this was less realistic?
Source: Roger Ebert gave the film two and a half stars, arguing the realism in actual horses and their blinding, "strangely enough, get in the way of the play's own reality' Roger Ebert, "Equus," Rogerebert.com, 9 November 1977, URL accessed 23 October 2016.; In stage productions, the horses are portrayed by human actors, often muscular men wearing tribal-style masks. Richard Harland Smith , "Equus (1977)," Turner Classic Movies, URL accessed 24 October 2016.
5x expanded by Ribbet32 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC).
- REDIRECT Template:•
Some issues found.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 1132 chars to 6864 chars since 13:15, 03 September 2016 (UTC), a 6.06-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 6864 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✗ This article has the following issues:
{{EngvarB}}from June 2016
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 29.1% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- REDIRECT Template:•No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 154 characters
- ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 141 characters
- ✓ Ribbet32 has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 0 more DYKs.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:30, 30 October 2016 (UTC)