Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Error has no rights"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Buidhe
(reply)
imported>Antony-22
(comment)
Line 50: Line 50:
 
[[User:Hawkeye7|<span style="color:#800082">Hawkeye7</span>]] [[User_talk:Hawkeye7|<span style="font-size:80%">(discuss)</span>]] 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 
[[User:Hawkeye7|<span style="color:#800082">Hawkeye7</span>]] [[User_talk:Hawkeye7|<span style="font-size:80%">(discuss)</span>]] 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 
:*You're right, {{self-trout}}. I was citing the wrong source. Now fixed ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 05:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 
:*You're right, {{self-trout}}. I was citing the wrong source. Now fixed ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 05:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
<!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The wording of the hook is a bit more extreme than the quoted text; "did not deserve" is not the same thing as "enjoyed no title in principle to".  A wording like "were not entitled to" would be in line with the text.  There are a couple of sentences in the article I have similar concerns about, but I have to sit down and see if I can get a copy of the sources first.  [[User:Antony-22|Antony&ndash;'''''22''''']] (<sup>[[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Antony-22|contribs]]</sub>) 07:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 07:02, 23 September 2020

Error has no rights

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 19:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC).

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

Reviewer's comments
  • The first sentence of the article is sourced to Hertzke, but he does not mention heresy or the Inquisition
  • Similarly, the quote from Pope Gregory is not there either - are you citing the correct article?
  • Nor it the second paragraph of the Repudiation section, which talks only of the 1990s on. I would suggest that date is correct.
  • Strongly suggest that this be cleaned up. I am reluctant to certify that the article is fully cited under the circumstances.
On the other hand...
  • The main hook is supported by fn 6.
  • Alt hook supported by the New York Times source

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg The wording of the hook is a bit more extreme than the quoted text; "did not deserve" is not the same thing as "enjoyed no title in principle to". A wording like "were not entitled to" would be in line with the text. There are a couple of sentences in the article I have similar concerns about, but I have to sit down and see if I can get a copy of the sources first. Antony–22 (talkcontribs) 07:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)