Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Error has no rights"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Buidhe (reply) |
imported>Antony-22 (comment) |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
[[User:Hawkeye7|<span style="color:#800082">Hawkeye7</span>]] [[User_talk:Hawkeye7|<span style="font-size:80%">(discuss)</span>]] 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC) | [[User:Hawkeye7|<span style="color:#800082">Hawkeye7</span>]] [[User_talk:Hawkeye7|<span style="font-size:80%">(discuss)</span>]] 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
:*You're right, {{self-trout}}. I was citing the wrong source. Now fixed ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 05:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC) | :*You're right, {{self-trout}}. I was citing the wrong source. Now fixed ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 05:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | < | + | :::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The wording of the hook is a bit more extreme than the quoted text; "did not deserve" is not the same thing as "enjoyed no title in principle to". A wording like "were not entitled to" would be in line with the text. There are a couple of sentences in the article I have similar concerns about, but I have to sit down and see if I can get a copy of the sources first. [[User:Antony-22|Antony–'''''22''''']] (<sup>[[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Antony-22|contribs]]</sub>) 07:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 07:02, 23 September 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Error has no rights
- ... that according to the traditional Catholic view that "error has no rights", non-Catholics did not deserve civil or political rights? Source: "A central component of the traditional church-state model was the principle that "error had no rights." This principle was strongly reas serted by Pope Pius IX (1846-1878). Within this framework those outside the Catholic church enjoyed no title in principle to political and civil rights because they lacked the true faith" https://www.jstor.org/stable/23559453
- ALT1:... that the traditional Catholic view that "error has no rights" was rejected during the Vatican II reforms? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1965/12/08/archives/freedom-of-religion-vatican-decree-supplants-ancient-doctrine-that.html
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 19:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC).
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Reviewer's comments
- The first sentence of the article is sourced to Hertzke, but he does not mention heresy or the Inquisition
- Similarly, the quote from Pope Gregory is not there either - are you citing the correct article?
- Nor it the second paragraph of the Repudiation section, which talks only of the 1990s on. I would suggest that date is correct.
- Strongly suggest that this be cleaned up. I am reluctant to certify that the article is fully cited under the circumstances.
- On the other hand...
- The main hook is supported by fn 6.
- Alt hook supported by the New York Times source
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- You're right, Template:Self-trout. I was citing the wrong source. Now fixed (t · c) buidhe 05:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
The wording of the hook is a bit more extreme than the quoted text; "did not deserve" is not the same thing as "enjoyed no title in principle to". A wording like "were not entitled to" would be in line with the text. There are a couple of sentences in the article I have similar concerns about, but I have to sit down and see if I can get a copy of the sources first. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 07:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)