Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Erythemis simplicicollis"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Miyagawa
(Reviewed)
imported>EdChem
(FYI Miyagawa - bot issue is due to a copy of Wikipedia content to an outside site)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This bot is experimental; please [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DYKReviewBot|report any issues]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 23:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This bot is experimental; please [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DYKReviewBot|report any issues]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 23:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Haven't been able to spot the issues highlighted by the bot. Article meets the size and citation requirements, QPQ done etc. No close paraphrasing as far as I can see (it may simply be a terminology issue). I think the Alt hook works better than the original. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 17:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Haven't been able to spot the issues highlighted by the bot. Article meets the size and citation requirements, QPQ done etc. No close paraphrasing as far as I can see (it may simply be a terminology issue). I think the Alt hook works better than the original. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 17:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 +
:::{{ping|Miyagawa}}  FYI, the issue the bot has noted is that material at [https://www.tumblr.com/tagged/Libellulidae this site] is clearly the same as in the article, but it has been copied from Wikipedia and attributed, so there is no actual copyvio issue.  Earwig can detect duplication but can't tell which is a copy of the other.  [[User:EdChem|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem|talk]]) 14:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:46, 1 July 2016

Erythemis simplicicollis

  • ... that reproductive adult eastern pondhawks have a lifespan of about ten days but are to be seen most of the summer in Florida?

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:18, 23 June 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol support vote.svg No issues found.
    • This article has been expanded from 367 chars to 2463 chars since 17:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC), a 6.71-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2463 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • There is possible close paraphrasing on this article with 29.1% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 130 characters
  • This is Cwmhiraeth's 1287th nomination. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Hannah Beachler was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svg Haven't been able to spot the issues highlighted by the bot. Article meets the size and citation requirements, QPQ done etc. No close paraphrasing as far as I can see (it may simply be a terminology issue). I think the Alt hook works better than the original. Miyagawa (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:Ping FYI, the issue the bot has noted is that material at this site is clearly the same as in the article, but it has been copied from Wikipedia and attributed, so there is no actual copyvio issue. Earwig can detect duplication but can't tell which is a copy of the other. EdChem (talk) 14:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)