Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Erythranthe and Erythranthe suksdorfii"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>KAVEBEAR
imported>KAVEBEAR
Line 24: Line 24:
 
-->
 
-->
 
:*NOTE--I moved this from my user space to article space on 12 February 2017, UTC. See both article's history edit summary.  [[User:HalfGig|<font color="darkolivegreen">'''HalfGig'''</font>]] [[User talk:HalfGig|<font color="orangered">'''talk'''</font>]] 00:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:*NOTE--I moved this from my user space to article space on 12 February 2017, UTC. See both article's history edit summary.  [[User:HalfGig|<font color="darkolivegreen">'''HalfGig'''</font>]] [[User talk:HalfGig|<font color="orangered">'''talk'''</font>]] 00:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough and long enough. The articles and hooks are referenced. No copyright or neutrality issue detected. Both QPQs are done. Good to go.-[[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] ([[User talk:KAVEBEAR|talk]]) 18:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough and long enough. The articles and hooks are referenced. No copyright or neutrality issue detected. Both QPQs are done. Image is also appropriately licensed. Good to go.-[[User:KAVEBEAR|KAVEBEAR]] ([[User talk:KAVEBEAR|talk]]) 18:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:17, 14 February 2017

Erythranthe, Erythranthe suksdorfii

Erythranthe suksdorfii
Erythranthe suksdorfii

Created by HalfGig (talk) and Sminthopsis84 (talk). Nominated by HalfGig (talk) at 00:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC).

  • NOTE--I moved this from my user space to article space on 12 February 2017, UTC. See both article's history edit summary. HalfGig talk 00:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough and long enough. The articles and hooks are referenced. No copyright or neutrality issue detected. Both QPQs are done. Image is also appropriately licensed. Good to go.-KAVEBEAR (talk) 18:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)