Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Erythranthe cuprea"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>HalfGig
(Sminthopsis84)
imported>Sminthopsis84
(some edits made)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:*Forgot to mention, QPQ completed, and I will AGF for the three sources I cannot access. <font color="#8b4513">[[User:Mindmatrix|Mind]]</font><font color="#ee8811">[[User_talk:Mindmatrix|matrix]]</font> 00:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 
:*Forgot to mention, QPQ completed, and I will AGF for the three sources I cannot access. <font color="#8b4513">[[User:Mindmatrix|Mind]]</font><font color="#ee8811">[[User_talk:Mindmatrix|matrix]]</font> 00:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 +
:*I've made some edits related to the polymorphism and the duplication. [[User:Sminthopsis84|Sminthopsis84]] ([[User talk:Sminthopsis84|talk]]) 02:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:57, 15 February 2017

Erythranthe cuprea

Erythranthe cuprea
Erythranthe cuprea

Created by HalfGig (talk). Self-nominated at 18:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Nominated same day it was moved to main namespace, and just over 1500 bytes, satisfying length and date criteria. The source text refers to "petal lobe anthocyanin pigmentation" polymorphism, but the article only states "petal lobe polymorphism"; is there a reason for the use of the more general statement? Can you clarify the term "duplication" in the quotation; is this gene duplication or chromosomal duplication? (Perhaps remove the quotation, rephrase, and provide a link for duplication and "trans-regulatory mechanism".) In "Its characteristics in nectar and petal shape...", the source refers more specifically to "corolla", not just petal; should this be mentioned in the text? I've added several links to the article - can you please ensure they are correct, and if not, update them? Image is properly licenced and created by uploader, and is suitable at the scale needed for DYK. Hook is short and cited, but I don't think it will generate many views for the article. Perhaps you can mention other species that have cyanidin (with ref, of course), or perhaps that the colouration is derived by a different mechanism from other species in the genus. Mindmatrix 00:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Forgot to mention, QPQ completed, and I will AGF for the three sources I cannot access. Mindmatrix 00:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
  • I've made some edits related to the polymorphism and the duplication. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 02:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)