Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Euphenics"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | ||
| − | The result was: '''rejected''' by '''< | + | The result was: '''rejected''' by '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:#000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color:#FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 16:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)<br />}} |
====Euphenics==== | ====Euphenics==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Euphenics|Euphenics}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Euphenics|Euphenics}} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Sorry, I don't know how I made that typo...the correct article is Euphenics... [[User:Mythia|Mythia]] ([[User talk:Mythia|talk]]) 17:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC) | Sorry, I don't know how I made that typo...the correct article is Euphenics... [[User:Mythia|Mythia]] ([[User talk:Mythia|talk]]) 17:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The article is new and nicely referenced (8 different books with page references - well done). All the sources are offline, but looking at the list of sources, one gets the impression that the article creator knows their stuff. I certainly have no knowledge in that area, so couldn't comment on the content. I don't have a problem with assuming good faith for the hook fact. What bothers me, though, is that the article very much feels like a stub. Technically, it's just long enough, but I suggest that some more content be put to it before it's mainpage ready. I'm happy for other editors to chip in and agree or disagree with this judgement call. I also suggest that the article could do with a few more wikilinks; there are some pretty technical terms that the uninitiated might well want to read up on. I wikilinked [[Artificial cardiac pacemaker|pacemaker]] in the hook. '''< | + | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The article is new and nicely referenced (8 different books with page references - well done). All the sources are offline, but looking at the list of sources, one gets the impression that the article creator knows their stuff. I certainly have no knowledge in that area, so couldn't comment on the content. I don't have a problem with assuming good faith for the hook fact. What bothers me, though, is that the article very much feels like a stub. Technically, it's just long enough, but I suggest that some more content be put to it before it's mainpage ready. I'm happy for other editors to chip in and agree or disagree with this judgement call. I also suggest that the article could do with a few more wikilinks; there are some pretty technical terms that the uninitiated might well want to read up on. I wikilinked [[Artificial cardiac pacemaker|pacemaker]] in the hook. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:#000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color:#FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 06:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC) |
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The use of a pacemaker may be considered "Euphenics" and some genetic engineering may be "Euphenics" However, a pacemaker is a device but not an example of genetic engineering. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 23:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC) | ::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The use of a pacemaker may be considered "Euphenics" and some genetic engineering may be "Euphenics" However, a pacemaker is a device but not an example of genetic engineering. --[[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 23:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] No attempt adding more content in the last fortnight. No alt hook provided within the last week. I'm afraid that we will thus have to reject this nomination. '''< | + | :::*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] No attempt adding more content in the last fortnight. No alt hook provided within the last week. I'm afraid that we will thus have to reject this nomination. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:#000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color:#FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 00:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC){{#if:no|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 19:17, 30 January 2019
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Schwede66 16:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Euphenics
Created by Mythia (talk). Self nom at 16:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Looked at the Eugenics article, and it does not contain the word pacemaker. Euphenics contains the following statement: Euphenics is used today in the medical community to more generally refer to methods of affecting a genetic condition in a positive manner through diet, lifestyle or environment, such as the use of insulin to control diabetes or installation of a pacemaker to offset a heart defect.[8] I don't have access to that source. I'm just confused by the nomination, which appears to be a typographical error. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:09, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Uhm...the part you just copied says "...installation of a pacemaker..."? Mythia (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC) Sorry, I don't know how I made that typo...the correct article is Euphenics... Mythia (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
The article is new and nicely referenced (8 different books with page references - well done). All the sources are offline, but looking at the list of sources, one gets the impression that the article creator knows their stuff. I certainly have no knowledge in that area, so couldn't comment on the content. I don't have a problem with assuming good faith for the hook fact. What bothers me, though, is that the article very much feels like a stub. Technically, it's just long enough, but I suggest that some more content be put to it before it's mainpage ready. I'm happy for other editors to chip in and agree or disagree with this judgement call. I also suggest that the article could do with a few more wikilinks; there are some pretty technical terms that the uninitiated might well want to read up on. I wikilinked pacemaker in the hook. Schwede66 06:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)